AdSlot1

Eight year directorship ban dished up for restauranteur’s inadequate records

spices

AN Aberdeenshire director has been disqualified for failing to ensure her restaurant company kept adequate books and records.

Ambia Begum, (28), director of Lochnagar Indian Brasserie, a licensed Indian restaurant in Ballater, has been disqualified from being a director for 8 years, following an investigation by the Insolvency Service.

At a hearing in Aberdeen Sheriff Court on 25 February 2016, the Sheriff made an eight year order against Ambia Begum, which commences on 16 March 2016. The Disqualification prevents Ambia Begum from directly or indirectly becoming involved in the promotion, formation or management of a company for the duration of the order.

On 1 July 2014 Lochnagar Indian Brasserie, with debts of £424,962, was placed into compulsory liquidation following a winding up petition lodged by HM Revenue and Customs. Ambia Begum was the sole director of Lochnagar Indian Brasserie at that time.

Following the Liquidator’s appointment, the investigation found that from 1 December 2011 to 1 July 2014, the company’s books were inadequate, thereby not making it possible to:

  • Verify expenditure from the company bank account totalling £276,783.
  • Verify whether receipts into the company bank account, of £276,783, were a true representation of the sales achieved by the company, especially as, due to the nature of the business, a significant proportion of the sales were likely to have been cash.
  • Verify whether the company owned, or had disposed of, any assets and if so, what their value was.
  • Establish the true level of liabilities owed to H M Revenue and Customs Establish whether the company should have been registered for PAYE and NIC

Robert Clarke, Head of Company Investigation at the Insolvency Service said:

Directors who operate cash based businesses have to maintain sufficient records to explain where these monies have gone and following insolvency make sure that such records are delivered up for scrutiny by the relevant bodies.

By failing to do this the public can not be sure that all funds received by the company were used for legitimate purposes. The substantial period of this disqualification reflects the fact that when a company fails to keep adequate financial records it is simply not possible to determine whether there has been other, more serious, impropriety in relation to the management of its affairs.

 

Related reading

/IMG/375/162375/investigations-magnifying-glass
/IMG/254/147254/andrew-harding-exec-cima
/IMG/622/118622/iasb-reception
/IMG/625/209625/handshake-graphic