Standard Life Investments opposes EY's appointment as Shell auditors at AGM
EY's appointment as auditors of Shell has met with opposition from Standard Life Investments
EY's appointment as auditors of Shell has met with opposition from Standard Life Investments
STANDARD LIFE INVESTMENTS has voted against the appointment of EY as auditors of Royal Dutch Shell at the FTSE 100 oil giant’s annual general meeting.
The global asset manager previously raised questions over the appointment of EY amid concerns over conflicts of interest and auditor independence issues following the takeover of BG Group by Shell.
Standard Life was among the 7% of shareholders who voted against the motion to appoint EY in Shell’s AGM yesterday. Some 92.41% of investors voted in favour of EY’s appointment.
EY was appointed as Shell’s auditor in for the financial year 2016 and had already been serving as BG Group’s auditor since 2013. BG Group was merged with Shell in a £36bn deal in February. EY’s lead partner Allister Wilson was the also the lead partner for BG immediately prior to the takeover.
In a statement this week, Standard Life said it was concerned “that the interests of shareholders in both companies were adequately addressed”.
“Shell’s appointment of the audit partner at EY who was responsible for the BG Group audit, compounds the perception of conflicts of interest that we highlighted at Shell’s 2015 AGM,” it said.
“Standard Life Investments is a substantial investor in Shell and BG, and it is our view that the objectivity of Shell’s proposed auditor could indeed be impaired by their prior connection with BG.”
A Shell spokesman said: “EY was appointed as Shell’s auditor for the financial year 2016 following an extensive competitive tender, in line with industry best practice. Over 92% of shareholders supported the appointment at our 2016 AGM. We have full confidence in EY’s suitability for the role.”
EY said it was unable to comment.
More about:
In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...
View resourceIn recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...
View resourceIn a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...
View resourceThe first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...
View resourceSpeaking exclusively to Accountancy Age in the first of a two-part series, Sir Donald Brydon - author of the report into the effectiveness and quality...
View articleFollowing the release of the Brydon report, in which Sir Donald Brydon has made 64 recommendations on how to improve the troubled UK audit industry, A...
View articleThe UK’s audit and accountancy watchdog has announced it will expand its investigation into EY’s auditing of Thomas Cook’s financial statements to inc...
View articleAccountancy Age’s first filmed panel debate offers a discussion around the issue of trust in audit – a profession which encounters both a growing use ...
View articleThe Big Four firm has continued its investment in audit quality, talent, technology, environmental sustainability and its regional business. Read More...
View articleThe study comes amid growing international debate on the market value of auditors providing non-audit services. Read More...
View articleThe FRC has the power to investigate Thomas Cook’s auditors and any accountants that work for the company who are registered with a professional body ...
View articleThis figure is up from £3.58bn in 2018, where the Big Four firm was second on Accountancy Age’s 50+50 list of accountancy firms. If they posted their ...
View article