THE TAXMAN has turned up the heat on takeaway businesses after winning a lengthy VAT battle against London-based Mexican eatery Chilango, after the restaraunt chain argued that its burritos, tacos and other menu items should be given a zero VAT rating.
In February 2013, the crowdfunded Mexican restaurant, which has five sites in London and two outside the capital, claimed a £681,623 refund from HMRC after deciding that its takeaway sales between December 2008 and March 2012 should have been zero-rated.
As well as that the burrito purveyors ceased to account for VAT its Mexican food items, with HMRC assessing that the chain owed £59,328 in VAT for June 2012, as well as £28,416 for the September 2012 period.
Chilango argued that that it was the overall temperature of the product that should determine whether the product was liable for VAT. Many of its products included meat filling which was heated, whereas its salad, salsa, cheese and other sauces were cold, which Chilango thought was reason enough to get away from paying VAT.
The FTT ruled that Chilango “failed to demonstrate that the products (containing all or some of meat, rice, beans and fajitas) were not heated for the common purpose of enabling them, or a part of them, to be consumed at a temperature above the ambient air temperature,” thus dismissing the firm’s appeal.
TS can only hope that Chilango doesn’t hike its burrito prices up; otherwise it will need another place to go after a Friday-night session.
HMRC has won its tenth successive case against tax avoidance schemes promoted by NT Advisors. The Court of Appeal has ruled that NT ... read more
HMRC is continuing to ramp up the number of raids on premises it carries out as part of criminal investigations, searching 761 properties in the last year
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
Three former Tesco executives, including the former finance director of Tesco UK, have denied charges of fraud and false accounting in relation to a £326m accounting scandal at the supermarket