Advisers gravely concerned over HMRC debt collection plans

Advisers gravely concerned over HMRC debt collection plans

ICAEW members express significant concerns over HMRC direct debt recovery plans, at institute's Wyman Symposium

TAX PRACTITIONERS have raised serious concerns over plans for HM Revenue & Customs to be afforded powers allowing them to deduct tax directly from debtors’ bank accounts.

The powers, originally announced in March’s Budget, extend as far as to include building society accounts and ISAs, with the caveat that at least £5,000 must be left across all the accounts. Debtors must owe at least £1,000 to be pursued in this way and will have been contacted at least four times for the measure to be exercised.

Currently, HMRC estimates 17,000 taxpayers will be affected annually.

Prior to presentations at the ICAEW’s Wyman Symposium, 65% of attendees disagreed with the direct debt recovery powers.

In particular, many were worried about HMRC’s ability to conduct direct debt recovery without making errors.

“Most arguments against DRD boil down to HMRC’s lack of ability in administration to safely carry it out,” noted Devereux Chambers tax barrister Jolyon Maugham.
But the move is not without its supporters, of which Maugham was one.

“It only relates to tax that is due, hasn’t been paid and which the taxpayer isn’t disputing,” he said.

“We have to find a way of getting people to pay the tax they owe. Similar powers are used in Australia, Sweden and USA and there are few examples of misuse,” argued IoD head of taxation Stephen Herring.

But the removal of the courts from the process was a source of consternation for many, in particular given the fact HMRC already can collect debts from bank accounts if it goes through the courts.

“So why does it need new powers?” asked Pump Tax Chambers’ Jonathan Schwarz. “This measure will affect vulnerable people.”

Following the discussions, 53% of the Wyman attendees felt direct debt recovery was wholly unnecessary, while an additional 17% believed it requires significant alterations. In total, a cumulative 70% disagreed with the proposals.

“It’s clearly worrying if a roomful of tax advisers and accountants can’t support the proposals. HMRC should drop it,” said Keith Gordon of Atlas Tax Chambers.

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

Professional Services Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

2y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

Accounting Firms Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

2y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

Making Tax Digital Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

2y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource