PAC risks credibility after accusing Big Four of driving tax policy

PAC risks credibility after accusing Big Four of driving tax policy

In accusing the Big Four of influencing tax policy for their own gain, the Public Accounts Committee risks its reputation

IN MAKING ACCUSATIONS of impropriety and conflicted interests against Big Four advisers, Margaret Hodge and her colleagues in the Public Accounts Committee have risked draining their work of much of its credibility.

The aspersions she and the committee cast in accusing tax experts of driving government policy to suit their firms’ and clients’ interests are serious. It calls into question the integrity of Treasury ministers, just as it does the staff of the four firms.

But judging by the Treasury’s stinging rebuttal to the allegations and the wider response of the profession, it clearly is not the case, and there are stringent regulations to guard against the committee’s concerns being borne out.

The committee begins to appear somewhat ridiculous.

As KPMG UK head of tax Jane McCormick points out in her statement on the matter, the ICAEW’s professional code of conduct ensures conflicts of interest cannot occur.

In any case, what alternative is there to the Treasury and HM Revenue & Customs using people who have experience of tax and accounting at the highest level to advise on matters of tax and accountancy? Are they to start garnering the advice of everyone but those who know best?

This story has the potential to cause a huge amount of damage to the way tax legislation is produced, should it get out of hand.

The government can ill-afford to silo itself off from industry experts who, after all, are hugely experienced and eminently qualified to discuss issues and offer their analysis of tax policy and how to improve it.

One measure that could dispel the perception of cosy relationships would be to publish relationships between companies and tax authorities.

Another would be to afford more resources to HMRC and the Treasury so that they might not need to call on the industry so much to provide supplementary knowledge and resources.

One thing we can be sure of, though, is that divorcing government departments from industry experts won’t help anyone.

Calum Fuller is the tax correspondent for Accountancy Age and Financial Director.

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

Professional Services Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

4m

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

8m

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

Accounting Firms Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3m

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

Making Tax Digital Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

4m

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource