Aussies advise Lords on ‘proportionate’ liability

Aussies advise Lords on 'proportionate' liability

Australian institute tells House of Lords that capping liability, government oversight and professional have changed the audit market

THE INSTITUTE of Chartered Accountants in Australia told the House of Lords this week of their experience regulating their audit market, suggesting, among other things, that their mandatory proportionate liability model – as opposed to the UK limited liability model – could help in reducing audit market competition.

Lee White and Andrew Stringer, the institute’s officials, told the hearing via videolink that the UK model has “a discretionary element [which] may be working against mid-tier or smaller audit firms seeking to engage with significantly larger clients.”

“In the last five or six years there’s been four significant changes to the policy framework in Australia – the creation of a government audit oversight body (similar to the FRC in the UK); making auditing standards legally enforceable; independent rules for auditors written into our law; and the creation and development of professional standards legislation and proportionate liability,” White explained.

Big Four firms, however, still dominate the audit market in Australia, though to a lesser extent than the UK. White believes the policy changes have been a factor, though he also noted “the geographical spread of Australia helps firms remain competitive.”

The raft of new regulations, however, caused some smaller firms to drop out of providing audit services, unable to cope with the changes. Rather than leading to greater concentration in the Big Four, White said: “The work available didn’t flow up to large firms, only to the next layer up in size.” The main concerns regulators expressed, White added, came from the practice of discounting audit fees, which they felt could lead to a decrease in audit quality.

White and Stringer told the hearing the role of audit needed to expand from its current “retrospective examination of financial statements” and advised the UK should ensure “regulation of cross-border activities does not become a barrier to those wishing to enter the audit market.”

Asked by Lord Best if auditing rules had gone too far, however, they responded: “We think in Australia it’s been a fairly good balance. The combination of government oversight, professional standards and capping of liability have bought about the right framework.”

 

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

Professional Services Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

2y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

Accounting Firms Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

2y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

Making Tax Digital Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

2y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource