E&Y paid £33m for Metronet administration

E&Y paid £33m for Metronet administration

NAO slams corporate governance and leadership at the failed company and discloses E&Y's £33m pay packet for handling the administration which cost the taxpayer up to £410m

Ernst & Young was paid £33m for handling the administration of Metronet,
the company which left the maintenance of two thirds of the London Underground
in limbo when it collapsed.

The failure cost the taxpayer up to £410m, the National Audit Office also
disclosed in a highly-critical report released today.

‘The taxpayer has borne some of the direct costs of Metronet’s failure,
including the unexpected upfront payment of £1.7bn. We estimate there has been a
direct loss to the taxpayer of between £170m and £410m,’ the NAO said.

The government had to shell out the £1.7bn to cover Metronet’s debt
obligations to its lenders, which would have been paid back over the course of
the 30-year contract if the company had not collapsed.

‘The main cause of Metronet’s failure was its poor corporate governance and
leadership. Many decisions had to be agreed unanimously by five shareholders,
which all acted as Metronet’s suppliers and had different motivations depending
on their roles. The executive management changed frequently and was unable to
manage the work of its shareholder-dominated supply chain effectively,’ the NAO
said.

The suppliers had power over some of the scope of work, expected to be paid
for extra work undertaken and had better access to cost information than the
management, the NAO said.

‘The poor quality of information available to management, particularly on the
unit costs of the station and track programmes, meant that Metronet was unable
to monitor costs and could not obtain adequate evidence to support claims to
have performed work economically and efficiently.’

The public sector watchdog called for an annual review of any future work,
including an audit of financial models produced to improve the transparency of
information about delays or cost overruns and make the Department for Transport
aware of any risk to the taxpayer in any future.

The NAO added future Public-Private Partnership contracts should be awarded
to bodies which had clear leadership, a credible corporate governance structure
and an approach to securing suppliers which could clearly demonstrate value for
money.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource