More shareholders power is a shot in the arm for agms

More shareholders power is a shot in the arm for agms

The fat cats are under attack again. John Davies thinks government thinks government plans to give shareholders more power will be a shot in the arm for agms.

The rebellion of BT’s small shareholders at its agm in July, and the fall-out from the collapse of the Marconi share price, have once more threatened to undo the progress made over the last decade by Cadbury, Greenbury and Hampel in increasing the level of transparency and accountability in the relationship between directors and shareholders.

Research has found that directors of FTSE-100 companies received average pay rises of more than 28% last year (more than five times the increase in the UK’s average wage) despite the 10% fall of the stock market during 2000. Even after the effect of bonus schemes and long-term incentive plans was taken away, the average rise in base salaries was 22%.

The Government was always going to be on safe ground in announcing its intention to require listed companies to prepare remuneration reports and put them to shareholder votes.

The shareholder vote will be advisory only and will not overrule any director’s contractual entitlements. But faced with having to explain away the discrepancy between a falling share price and enormous bonus payments, boards will be obliged in future to think very carefully about the full implications of their decisions on pay.

This new development was inevitable. The company law review’s final report recommends that directors should be subject to a duty to act in a way that preserves the company’s ‘business reputation’. Shareholders should, in future, be allowed to take legal action against directors – in the name of their company – should directors fail to comply with their duties.

The introduction of mandatory works councils under a forthcoming EU directive will further increase the potential for scrutiny and criticism of boardroom pay.

Arguably, though, the biggest impact of the DTI move will be the shot in the arm it will give to the agm. The company law review has already proposed that company agms should be allowed to take place on a ‘virtual’ – ie multi-location – basis, and this will almost certainly be acted upon by the Government.

Giving more shareholders the opportunity to participate in agms is one thing, presenting them with the incentive to do so is another. The prospect of being asked critically to review, and to vote on, boardroom pay policy is exactly what they have been waiting for.

  • John Davies is head of business law at ACCA
Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource