UK police can now demand encryption keys

Dormant piece of RIP Act activated to catch terrorists and paedophiles

Written by Ian Williams

People in the UK who encrypt their data are now obliged by law to give up the encryption keys to law enforcement officials if requested under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIP Act).

Section 49 of Part III of the RIP Act compels a person, when served with a notice, to hand over an encryption key or render the requested material intelligible by the authorities.

This section of the legislation was included in the original draft but was not activated because encryption was not considered to be sufficiently widely used at the time to be of concern.

If the order to give up the encryption keys forms part of a terrorism investigation, refusal to do so can mean up to five years in jail. In non-terrorism cases refusal can mean a two-year sentence.

The new law came into effect from 1 October, the same day that the RIP Act forced all telecoms companies to log details about every call and text message sent and received in the UK for one year.

The Home Office claims that the move will help in the investigation of terrorists as well as criminal gangs and paedophiles.

"The measures are intended to ensure that the ability of public authorities to protect the public and the effectiveness of their other statutory powers are not undermined by the use of technologies to protect electronic information," said a spokesman for the Home Office.

Civil liberty groups have slammed the activation of this part of the Act, however, saying that is it a major invasion of privacy and will have little or no purpose in solving crimes.

Those who genuinely have something to hide would be better off serving the two-year or five-year sentence than giving up the encryption key, the groups say.

Some commentators have also pointed out that, as the encryption key is usually a long series of alphanumeric characters, it is possible that the key may have been lost or forgotten, leaving the owner having to protest their innocence.

The Home Office defended the move, saying that it was consistent with the European Convention on Human Rights, which was last amended on 20 January 1966.

The UK government also made assurances that all requests would be necessary and proportionate.

If the authorities demand that information is provided from someone who believes this is not the case, the accused has the option of registering a complaint with the Investigatory Powers Tribunal which has the power to enforce or reject the demand.

Advertisement

Enjoyed this article? Help spread the word:

Comments

White papers

Related jobs

Spotlight

Richard Mayfield, Waitrose FD

Profile: Richard Mayfield, Waitrose FD

Waitrose FD Richard Mayfield tells our reporter about the pros...

Credit crunch special: guiding business through the storm

The downturn is hurting and recession looms. Will accountants be...

Beat the credit crunch with Young Professional

Latest issue features a guide to advancement during economic uncertainty,...

Find your next job

Find your next job

Advertisement

Salary Checker

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Search white papers

Search white papers

Advertisement

Have your say

Would rumoured Treasury moves to abolish stamp duty do anything to help the housing market?
Yes, scrapping stamp duty has been a long time coming
No, any move is far too little, too late

Job of the week

More finance jobs...

Advertisement

Your next job