04 Jun 2009, David Jetuah, AccountancyAge
http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/1787380/frc-chief-warns-eu-breakaway
The UK’s top accountancy regulator has said that there are moves underway in the European Union looking to establish a breakaway version of international accounting standards, a move that could undermine efforts to converge IFRS with US GAAP.
Paul Boyle, chief executive of the Financial Reporting Council, who is stepping down in November, warned that such a move would also have serious repercussions in the US, as foreign issuers would have to iron out the differences between IFRS-compliant accounts and US GAAP.
‘I think there’s a serious risk of this,’ said Boyle. ‘We’re not just imagining it.’
Speaking to Accountancy Age TV, Boyle warned that any EU action would undo significant progress to align US and European accounting. Boyle is stepping down later this year after FRC efforts to deal with one of the most turbulent periods in the history of companies, standard setters and the profession.
‘I’m hopeful that the EU will pull back from the brink,’ he said. ‘It would be a big step backwards. Also the requirement for non-reconciliation [of IFRS to US GAAP for foreign issuers] is dependent on the IASB’s version of IFRS. The SEC would reimpose the very costly reconciliation.’
The FRC noted last week the recent increase in political pressure on both the IASB and Financial Accounting Standards Board.
‘[The FRC continues] to have significant concerns that the EU might adopt its own version of IFRS rather than the standards as published by the IASB,’ Boyle said in the reporting watchdog’s annual report last week.
© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093
Visitor comments
Inadequate IFRS for Banking Industry
Thw whole issue is tied up with current implementation of IFRS being inadequate for the banking industry - not only in Europe but in the USA and worldwide too.
Unfortunately, the USA's (SEC and FASB)attempt to address the problems of "marking such instruments to-market" in illiquid markets missed the essential problem. For long-lifed instruments, by forcing the banks to "mark-to-market", the banks were forced to declare profits which had not yet been earned - in a situation where it can be demonstrated that inherent in the "market price" of those instruments was recognition that the prices could change significantly in future (such as deterioration in economic circumstances, etc).
The IASB is now proposing to issue an Exposure Draft to address the problems of the banking industry having previously been prevented from making adequate provisions for future losses in holdings of complex financial products.
Regrettably, at this point in time, there is little to indicate that the IASB properly understands the nature of the problem, and hence the limitations of how the concept of "Fair Value" has been implemented in practice for the banking industry. FASB and SEC failed with their own attempt; will the IASB do any better?
Posted by: Hugh J Osburn , 06 Jun 2009 | 00:00