14 Mar 2008, Accountancy Age, AccountancyAge
http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/1762328/tax-gap-forced-hmrc
HM Revenue and Customs dramatically abandoned its attempts to keep details of the 'tax gap' secret just before the Budget.
HMRC estimates the sum lost to tax avoidance and evasion to be somewhere between £11bn and £41bn each year. Total government tax receipts for 2008 are expected to reach £575bn. The take from corporation tax alone is only £52bn.
An information tribunal was due to hear HMRC’s appeal on 6 and 7 March against an order by information commissioner Richard Thomas to disclose estimates of direct tax lost to avoidance and evasion, following a freedom of information request by Private Eye reporter Richard Brooks.
The hearing was slated for a full two day hearing with two Revenue officials lined up to appear as witnesses. The afternoon before, however, HMRC withdrew its appeal without explanation. HMRC admitted that its legal fees came to £13,000.
For several days officials then refused to hand over the details, before uploading them onto the Revenue’s website on Budget day this week, having briefed the Financial Times. The paper reported the tax gap figures, showing up to £41bn lost every year, as part of its extensive Budget coverage.
HMRC’s capitulation marks the end of a battle to suppress the information lasting nearly three years. Among the many reasons it had given for refusing to disclose the figures was that the information could benefit tax evaders by 'emboldening them to exploit areas of vulnerability', and that public knowledge of the tax gap could encourage non-compliance by indicating unfairness in the tax system. Officials had even claimed that publishing the information could unsettle the stock markets.
In June last year Richard Thomas rejected HMRC’s arguments, concluding: 'If the public realised the extent to which tax evasion is a drain on the economy, it could create an atmosphere in which evasion and avoidance would be less socially acceptable'. It is understood that his legal team were confident of their prospects at the information tribunal.
An HMRC spokesman said that the department took the decision to release the figures on Budget day as it was also releasing a renewed compliance strategy on the same day.
© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093
Visitor comments
Avoidance and evasion are not the same
There is a great confusion over the difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance, partly because of the way the government talks about them.
Tax avoidance is the legal use of the tax regime to one's own advantage, in order to reduce the amount of tax that is payable by means that are within the law.
By contrast tax evasion is the general term for efforts to not pay taxes by illegal means.
This article suggests that tax avoidance should be made less socially acceptable. That means that if someone has a choice of two perfectly sensible and legal ways to arrange their affairs, there should be strong social pressure for them to choose the one that involves paying more tax. That's a ridiculous suggestion!
I am all in favour of a crack-down on tax evasion.
Posted by: Steven Tucker , 19 Mar 2008 | 00:00