Logo
Print this page
Save to disk
Go back

Smaller firms clean up as recession sees audit clients shun the Big Four

03 Sep 2009, Mario Christodoulou, AccountancyAge

http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/1752914/smaller-firms-clean-recession-audit-clients-shun-big-four

The Big Four are losing work to their smaller competitors in what could be an emerging shakeup of the audit industry.

Medium and small accounting firms say they are going head-to-head with industry heavyweights PricewaterhouseCoopers, Ernst & Young, Deloitte and KPMG, and winning jobs that were once beyond their reach.

The firms claim cost pressure combined with a growing ambivalence from the Big Four towards its smaller audit clients has created the opportunity for smaller firms to win new work.

Melissa Bowers, partner with Macclesfield-based firm Harts LLP, points to the Big Four’s practice of using senior partners to ‘seal the deal’ while leaving junior employees to do the grunt work, which has alienated smaller clients.

This practice, combined with cost pressure, has driven audit clients into the arms of local firms. She has won work from clients who employed the same auditor for more than a generation.

‘We did have a case where the client had been with one of the Big Four for 35-years,’ she said.

‘It is possibly smaller work for them and they are possibly not giving them the same priority and attention.’

Michael Good, partner at Oxford-based firm Critchleys, said that he believed smaller clients are no longer willing to fork out money for a big brand name firm.

‘They are asking themselves “do we need to pay the premium?” and “what are we getting for the premium?” and they are saying “actually not a lot”,’ he said.
‘Up to £20,000 for a big firm is not a big audit.’

Colin Howe, the vice president of the UK200 group and managing principle with Hillier Hopkins, said he had bid for contracts which, three years ago, did not exist.

‘For every three tenders we do the firm may only ever end up changing advisers once… but a few years ago we may not have had the oppourtunity to tender,’ he said.

‘The recession has opened people’s eyes to the fact that there is a viable alternative to the Big Four.’

He believes a fall in companies wanting to go public was one reason why the Big Four were suffering.

‘Historically, firms have gone for a Big Four where they are looking for a flotation and fundraising, and they have been told by finance advisers or nomads [nominated advisers] that they can add pence to their share price by having a better name on the audit report, but I think now the cost element is becoming more prevalent,’ he said.

Last week John Flaherty, Ernst & Young’s audit chief, said he had seen the biggest jump in audit tendering in a decade.

‘The current economic situation is creating a significant amount of audit tendering,’ he said.

‘We are seeing more driven on the grounds of price and [potential clients] asking if we can reduce the audit cost.’

Visitor comments

premium ... what premium?

Basic economics - economies of scale - dictates that larger entities operate at a lower unit cost!

So why aren't larger firms more competitive i.e. cheaper that small firms?

Could it be because they are inefficient, have delusions of grandeur & overpay themselves.

Posted by: CJ , 04 Sep 2009 | 00:00

© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093