UK firms are coming to terms with a newly effective section of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
(SOX) corporate governance rules requiring UK companies with a US
stock-market listing to show internal controls.
Often cited as one of the most knotty elements of SOX, Section 404 took
effect for non-US firms on 15 July and affects over 100 UK-based firms. The code
mandates that firms include in financial reports records of controls deployed
and their effectiveness. This would include data security measures taken, their
ongoing monitoring, and a record of any breaches or attempted breaches, for
example.
Advertisement
UK companies will together spend a total of about $350m on compliance,
according to estimates by the Association
of Chartered Certified Accountants. Those that are remiss face
multi-million-pound fines if they cannot demonstrate compliance, as well as
brand damage sustained by inevitable bad publicity.
To get around the problem, many firms are choosing to deploy best-practice
templates - such as ISO17799 and NIST for security - that help enforce and
accelerate compliance in processes.
“There’s no 100 percent SOX compliance,” said Brian Contos, chief security
officer of security and compliance reporting firm ArcSight. “Security doesn’t
equal compliance and compliance doesn’t equal security but there’s a huge amount
of overlap and one of the biggest problems companies face is ‘paralysis by
analysis’.”
Others said that controls on asset management are key in mitigating exposure.
Olivier Suard, marketing director at Comptel, a developer of operational
support systems for telecoms carriers, said firms need inventory controls for
accurate SOX compliance: “One angle of SOX is security but companies also need
to be able to report on the accuracy of the filing and for telecoms companies
and many others that means asset tracking is vital.”
In an 11 July announcement, the SEC reported on feedback, noting that, “the
Commission learned from participants that while Section 404 has produced
benefits, its implementation has been unduly costly”.
Other rules and regulations are due to hit financial services organisations
next year through the Capital Requirements Directive and Markets in Financial
Instruments Directive (Mifid).
Jim Fleming of regulatory compliance consulting firm FMConsult said, “They’re
proving a real bugbear and there’s going to be a lot of pain.”
Comments
Have your say on this article