The government may soon be forced to release many of its secret reports on
the costs, benefits and risks of its controversial identity (ID) card scheme
after the information commissioner last week ordered it to release a secret
Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) feasibility study on the initiative.
The ruling followed a complaint to the commissioner, the UK's data-protection
and freedom of information (FoI) watchdog, from Liberal Democrat MP Mark Oaten
in 2004, after the DWP refused his parliamentary question request to release the
report.
The DWP argued that to release its report on the benefits and risks of the
scheme would prejudice the government’s assessment of the ID card initiative and
make it harder to get good prices from suppliers.
But in his ruling, released this month, information commissioner Richard
Thomas said the public interest of disclosure outweighed the argument for
keeping the report secret. He added that his examination of the report found "
no information that would put the work of the DWP or any other government
department at risk".
Thomas also said that he was "not convinced that the commercial interests of
the Home Office would, or would be likely to, be prejudiced by its release".
The DWP now has until 5 July to release the report or appeal against the
ruling. A spokesman for the DWP said the department is currently considering
its options.
If the DWP does not successfully appeal against the decision, the government
can expect a wave of requests for the release of feasibility reports carried out
by other departments, according to a spokeswoman for the Liberal Democrats. "If
we get the precedent [from the DWP ruling] we'll put in other FoI requests to
try to get [the feasibility reports] all released," she added.
A spokesman for the Information Commissioner’s Office said that each future
request would be judged on its own merits, so despite the precedent there was no
guarantee all government reports on ID cards would be released.
However, the publication of any ID card studies could give IT directors at
public sector, local government and even private sector organisations a valuable
insight into the costs, risks and benefits expected from the new technology as
they develop their own strategies to use of biometric ID cards.
In separate news, the Financial Times today reported that the
procurement process for the ID card programme has been delayed until the autumn.
It was originally expected to start soon after the bill entered the statute
books in March this year.
However, a Home Office spokesman denied that there has been a delay, and said
that the government had been undertaking soundings on how the procurement
process should be carried out since 2002, and it would publish the feedback it
has received "in the next few weeks". He told IT Week that this
represented best practice for government procurements on the scale of the ID
card project and it was important to work with possible suppliers to develop a
viable procurement process.
The spokesman refused say when the Home Office expects to begin the formal
procurement process by inviting tenders.
Critics predicted that delays to the bill during the parliamentary process
coupled with the scale of the multi-billion-pound project means the government
will not meet its target to have significant numbers of ID cards in circulation
before the next general election, expected in 2009.
Comments
Have your say on this article