Many enterprise vendors are banking on desktop virtualisation playing a major
part within corporate IT infrastructure in the future. For customers, the
technology holds out the promise of easier management and better security by
pulling end-user accounts back into the datacentre, while still allowing access
to standard Windows applications.
As a side effect of this move towards virtual desktop machines, enterprises
may soon be deploying more thin clients than in the past, to serve as an
appliance-like user console for virtual Windows PCs that are actually hosted in
a firm’s datacentre.
One vendor hoping to benefit from this is
Igel
Technology, which has just announced membership of both the
VMware and
Citrix
certification programmes, the aims of which are to assure customers that the
thin clients they buy will work with the virtual desktop systems from the
respective vendors.
“Companies aren’t going to need desktop PCs in the future,” said Stephen Yeo,
strategic marketing director at Igel. “In the corporate space you will have
laptops for mobile workers, and thin devices accessing virtual machines for
everyone else,” he said.
According to Yeo, VMware believes that desktop virtualisation is the next big
thing. “There are many more PCs than servers deployed in companies,” he pointed
out.
But VMware does not have this market to itself; Citrix is also a player,
although it has approached the market from the opposite end. “Citrix has
strength in delivery technology, while VMware has strength in virtualisation and
the datacentre,” said Yeo, adding that the two “will meet in the middle”.
Besides the issues of management and security, Yeo pointed to multi-core
processors as a factor that will drive greater take-up of desktop virtualisati
on.
“The megahertz wars in chips have now turned into a core race,” he said,
referring to plans by AMD and Intel for chips with as many as 12 cores within
two years.
“Current operating systems are not much good at handling more than four
cores, so virtualisation is the only effective way to make use of all that
power. The more cores there are in the processor, the more redundant the desktop
PC becomes,” he said.
But while thin clients have been around for at least a decade, they have
largely been a niche device, used for basic data entry in environments such as
call centres. This is because some applications did not work well under a
server-based model where the desktop was effectively shared.
“Virtual PCs remove that, giving each user their own desktop, so companies
can migrate [users] to the datacentre without further risk,” said Yeo.
Yeo also pointed to moves by Citrix that will make the user experience of
virtual desktops as seamless as possible. The company’s
XenDesktop
Appliance programme specifies how the desktop console should look and behave
when used with Citrix infrastructure.
“With current thin clients, the remote session appears as a window, just like
any other application, but under XenDesktop, it fills the screen and you can’t
shrink it. It will smell, taste and look exactly like you are using a physical
PC,” explained Yeo.
Igel is just one of several vendors, including HP and Wyse, that have signed
up to the Citrix certification programme, as well as that of rival VMware.
However, Igel gives users the option to turn this appliance mode on or off,
so that they can still use the thin client’s browser or an alternative protocol
such as ICA or RDP.
“We feel it would be a weakness if our products had access to only one
protocol,” said Yeo. He explained that many enterprise applications, such as
SAP, are browser-based anyway, and so users can go direct to these from the thin
client and cut out the PC middleman.
The risk for vendors such as Igel is that the Citrix appliance scheme might
turn their products into commodities. Yeo said Igel’s “digital services”
strategy was one way the firm could differentiate itself.
“The best way to deliver a PC-like experience is to have services operate
close to the user. We’re looking at how virtual PCs can use digital services on
the thin client to deliver this,” he said.
This will see the device handling content such as Flash or Silverlight
animations, or even voice-over-IP calls, instead of the virtual machine on the
server. A similar approach is being developed by rival vendor Wyse with its
TCX
extensions.
If appliance-like consoles are able to deliver a comparable experience to a
full desktop PC, large enterprises may be tempted to migrate to a virtual
desktop architecture in future, and thin clients may finally live up to their
potential.
Comments
Have your say on this article