Businesses and consumers across the European Union
(EU) could look forward to cheaper
mobile phone calls and more services if EU commissioner for telecoms Viviane
Reding manages to carry out a widely reported plan to create a European
regulatory body.
Provisionally dubbed The European Telecom Market Authority (ETMA), the body
would have powers over and above those of the UK’s comms watchdog,
Ofcom, and could potentially force mobile
operators to give competitors equal access to their transmission networks. The
hope is that such a move would lead to a situation similar to that which
occurred after Ofcom’s settlement with BT in 2005, when the telco was forced to
split its network and services businesses and create
Openreach.
Through a process called local loop unbundling (LLU), Openreach allows BT’s
competitors equal access to telephone exchanges to put in their own comms
equipment. LLU is widely seen as having benefited users by providing them with
greater access to cheaper and faster broadband connectivity.
However, some experts see little likelihood of this scenario being played out
across Europe. Martin Gutberlet, research vice-president at analyst firm
Gartner, said countries such as Italy and Spain are already investigating the
possibility of splitting up former monopoly telcos into network and service
companies, but added that he doubted that such moves would necessarily lead to
the need for EU super regulation.
Gutberlet questioned whether there are any economic grounds for forcing telcos
to open up their networks. “With continuous falling prices for bandwidth, the
investment in infrastructure for network operators is getting more difficult,
and separation of networks and service doesn’t necessarily lead to new network
investments,” he said.
The operators themselves are understandably unenthusiastic about the idea of
having to deal with yet another layer of regulation.
An O2 spokesman said the company believes
competition, and not regulation, is the best way forward to deliver benefits to
the customer. O2 argued that the creation of a Europe-wide regulation would be
bad news for users. “The increased regulation through an extra layer of
bureaucracy would curb competition and consumer choice,” the spokesman said. He
added that the forced separation of companies could “undermine the stability and
predictability that the markets would require in order to make the necessary
further investments in next-generation networks”.
Orange also opposes the idea of a super
regulator, arguing that because markets vary greatly in different countries,
“you need to have expertise of a particular market to regulate it properly. We
feel Ofcom has this knowledge in the UK and a cross-Europe regulator would not.”
As for the separation of a telecoms network from the services it provides,
Orange said, “There’s no reason to do it. The market is fully competitive and
there is no dominant mobile provider, so no need to break up the companies.”
According to The New York Times, the ETMA plan will be formally presented to
individual national commissioners in November.
Comments
Have your say on this article