FRC addresses confusion over pensions impact of FRS102

by Tanjil Rashid, Professional Pensions

More from this author

20 Aug 2014

  • Financial Director
  • Comments
balance sheet

THE FRC has proposed amendments to its FRS102 accounting standard to address fears an overhaul of reporting standards will add millions to corporate liabilities.

The had been fears FRS102 would force private companies in the UK to book their defined benefit (DB) pension obligations along the lines of IFRIC 14, the international standard that applies to listed companies, resulting in extra liabilities on their balance sheet, sister title Professional Pensions reports.

Responding to informal consultations, the FRC has issued an exposure draft to clarify that no additional liabilities will be raised as a result of the change to FRS102 under new GAAP, as the new standard will be "consistent with current practice".

FRC director of accounting and reporting Anthony Appleton said the amendment was necessary "to clarify that FRS102 will mean companies continue to account for DB pensions under old GAAP".

The currently UK standards will be phased out by January 2015 to be replaced by FRS102, commonly known as ‘new GAAP'.

"It came to light that there had been a diversity of views about how to recognise liabilities of DB pension schemes under FRS102. These amendments straighten that out," said Appleton.

"We noted a strong consensus in favour of this in our informal consultations," he added.

PwC pensions actuary Paul Allen agreed that there would be "less divergence" in accounting practices as a result of the amendments.

"The issue I've been seeing is that because the wording of FRS102 is intentionally briefer," he added, "that does leave potential for different interpretations."

FRS102 will be replacing almost 3000 pages of the current GAAP with just over 300 pages.

The FRC are inviting comments to be received by 21 November 2014 and expects to issue the final amendments to FRS 102 in early 2015.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Divisional Financial Controller - Social Sciences

University-of-Oxford-120x60University of Oxford - Oxford - £65k per year

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

budget-management

Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.

cchcover

iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.