Underlying profits of FTSE 100 exceed IFRS figures

by Richard Crump

More from this author

19 Feb 2014

  • Financial Director
  • Comments

NON-FINANCIAL FTSE 100 companies are subjectively reporting exceptional items, which can give investors a misleading impression of the financial health of the company, Standard & Poor's has said.

According to the rating agency's study of non-financial FTSE 100 companies' last four years of financial reporting, underlying earnings have been presented that exceed the equivalent audited and unadjusted figures in almost three-quarters of cases.

The net result is that a company's profitability can appear higher than is the case when reporting under IFRS, S&P said.

"Companies reporting under IFRS frequently separate exceptional items they believe are non-operating or nonrecurring to produce adjusted or underlying earnings information that purports to better reflect business performance," said Standard & Poor's accounting specialist Sam Holland. "Taking underlying earnings without taking into account the nature of the exceptional items that a company has excluded can sometimes give a misleading picture of its earnings and future performance.

"The presentation of underlying earnings can lead users of financial statements to focus on companies' subjective, adjusted profit measures, rather than on the unadjusted, audited figures that the IASB mandates companies to disclose."

S&P added that more prescriptive and specific guidance is required to help auditors scrutinise underlying earnings and exceptional items.

"Where such financial metrics are disclosed, we would prefer them to be incorporated into the financial statements to elevate the level of audit assurance," S&P said.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication


Charterhouse Accountants

Finance Officer

Charterhouse Accountants, Beaconsfield, Permanent, Full Time, £ Competitive




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.