A recent update to Payment Card Industry (PCI) standards makes it mandatory
for any organisation handling online credit card transactions to install a web
application firewall, or have customer application codes reviewed for common
vulnerabilities.
The introduction of PCI Data Security Standard (DSS) requirement 6.6, along
with banks’ increasingly tough stance on merchants that fail to comply, is
expected to prompt a stampede for PCI compliance among UK firms.
Security reseller MIS is in no doubt of the market’s potential, having just
become the first UK Juniper, Check Point, RSA or Nokia partner to attain PCI
Qualified Security Assessor status (CRN Online, 2 July).
MIS director Etienne Greeff said: “Because PCI DSS has been delayed so much
and UK firms are so far behind, there is a massive backlog of firms that need
help to achieve compliance. PCI compliance is one of our top two business topics
for 2008.”
PCI DSS calls for merchants to invest in a whole range of security technology
besides web application firewalls, including encryption, authentication and
anti-virus software. Most industry observers believe financial penalties for
those that fail to comply with the checklist will not come into force until the
tail end of 2009.
However, Greeff indicated that those who do not fall in line could find
themselves in hot water a lot sooner. “It is true there are no financial
penalties, but it is incorrect to say there is no impetus for merchants to
comply. Banks are now going to merchants and imposing penalties if there is a
breach.
“They are doing it with tier-one retailers first and once they have reduced
the risk there they will go to the next level down.”
Ian Kilpatrick, chairman of security distributor Wick Hill, said that every
security reseller should be pushing PCI DSS to their customers as best practice.
“PCI DSS is a route to best practice rather than just a destination in
itself, so the channel should be taking users down this route,” he said. “Firms
should be using PCI DSS irrespective of whether it is for credit card data or
for key customer records as it is a real-world standard.
“I still see a number of resellers that are shy of PCI, but the checklist is
not rocket science and is well within the capabilities of any security
reseller,” added Kilpatrick.
Niche VARs working in areas such as authentication could use PCI to extend
their reach into adjacent areas such as data protection. “They should be telling
their customers: ‘PCI is going to bite, and since you have bought this component
of it, what are you doing around the other components?’,” said Kilpatrick.
However, not everyone shares this enthusiasm and the standard has received its
fair share of criticism, either for being too prescriptive, or ineffectual.
Database security vendor Secerno stands firmly in the ineffectual camp,
arguing that requirement 6.6 and the overall PCI standard remain “ineffective
for security”.
“PCI historically was written for e-commerce rather than general retailers
where breaches have actually been taking place. It is generally inadequate for
addressing the sort of internal threat that can be exploited easily, such as by
general or privileged users,” said Secerno in a hastily issued statement
following the introduction of section 6.6.
It continued: “The standard says nothing about any malware other than viruses,
it says nothing about encrypting internal data, it says nothing about protecting
data on private networks and it says nothing about securing the database.
Unfortunately, the internal threat is PCI’s blind spot.”
And not all resellers are completely convinced that PCI will be a major
driver of security spend over the next 18 months.
Jonathan Lassman, managing director of Check Point reseller Network Technology
Solutions (NTS), claimed the absence of financial penalties for non-compliance
has left a lack of firms to pitch to.
According to Lassman, UK organisations fall into two camps: those such as
most tier-one retailers that are already compliant, and those that will sit on
their hands until they see firms around them being fined.
“Until they see someone getting fined they will think they do not need to
bother,” he said.
However, Lassman is one of a small number of sceptics in the channel. Data
security vendor Protegrity is in the process of expanding its EMEA operations in
anticipation of a boom in PCI compliance projects.
Ian Schenkel, EMEA vice president at Protegrity, concluded: “PCI compliance
is definitely going to take hold. We have seen greater uptake in the US than in
Europe, but organisations are now having to look at it in a serious manner
because the credit card firms are becoming strict in enforcing it.”
Comments
Have your say on this article