The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) has
reportedly revised downward the number of certified emission reductions (CERs)
it expects to be issued by UN-approved carbon reduction projects in the coming
years, prompting analysts to predict that the price of carbon credits within the
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is likely to rise.
According to reports, UNEP said it now expects 1.48 billion CERs to be issued
by approved carbon reduction projects in the period to 2012, down from its
previous estimate of 1.51 billion.
Advertisement
The move is the latest in a series of downward revisions as a result of
bottlenecks in the project approval process that have led to delays in the
issuing of credits.
Henrik Hasselknippe, director of emissions trading analysis at analyst
Point Carbon, said that while UNEP was
seeking to ease the bottlenecks through the appointment of more project approval
staff, an increase in the number of projects applying to enter the CDM and
recent attempts to tighten the approval process meant that delays were still
occurring.
"UNEP has been reducing supply projections for some time," he said. "Fewer
credits being issued means you will have more people fighting over the same
projects and that will cause prices to rise."
He added that with the estimated supply of CERs still far exceeding the
number that can be imported into Europe's emissions trading scheme (ETS) any
delays should not directly affect the price of EU Allowances (EUAs) within the
European scheme. However, he admitted that the downgraded UN estimates were
adding to the sentiment that prices for both EUAs and CERs will rise in the
run-up to 2012.
Repeated
studies have estimated that the price of carbon credits within the EU ETS
will average between €38 (£31) and €45 per tonne over the 2008 to 2012 period,
representing a significant increase on the current market price of about €25 a
tonne.
In a submission at the UN's climate change talks in Ghana, the trade group
said that delays in approving legitimate carbon reduction projects were
resulting in "losses with regards to both opportunity costs and real costs to
CDM project developers".
It recommended that the UN should increase staffing levels at the office
tasked with checking and processing applications. "A process that can take three
meetings, delaying a project by four [to] five months, could be expedited if a
full-time [member of] staff were available to consider project issues more
frequently," said the association.
However, Hassleknippe insisted that good progress had already been made in
streamlining the approval process and that the delays were being addressed. "
The CDM approval procedures are the most detailed and robust we have for any
carbon reduction projects," he said. "There are always areas that can be
improved, but we shouldn't forget that this market is still very young and it is
getting better all the time."
Comments
Have your say on this article