Environment minister Phil Woolas has today admitted that climate change "
terrifies" him, warning that there is a tendency for people to ignore the full
scale of the geo-political risks posed by global warming.
"We're all used to seeing pictures of melting ice caps and thinking about
rising sea levels, but we don't see pictures of melting glaciers in the
Himalayas," he said, adding that if those glaciers melt they will disrupt the
flow of river systems, including the Yangtze and the Ganges, that provide water
to 4.5 billion people across "three nuclear-armed countries" in the form of
India, China and Pakistan.
Speaking at the
Corporate
Climate Response conference in London, Woolas said that in the light of
these realities, "if the government appears zealous on [the climate change]
issue, it is with good reason".
The minister's comments echo a
report
last month from former senior adviser to the UK Prime Minister's Strategy
Unit,
Nick
Mabey, which warned that a failure to curb climate change could result in
century long conflicts on a scale similar to the two World Wars.
Despite these threats, Woolas expressed confidence that disastrous levels of
climate change could be avoided, primarily through the construction of a "new
economy" built around carbon trading and emission reductions.
"The fear factor [over climate change] is not the main message," he said. "
The main message is that it is cheaper [to cut energy use]. If you want to get
the price of fuel down then go green."
Woolas argued that carbon cap-and-trade schemes could help accelerate
emission reductions and released new figures showing that despite widespread
criticism of the first phase of the European Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
total carbon emissions for firms covered by the scheme fell 2.9 million tonnes
in 2007 on a like-for-like basis. He admitted that the savings were modest when
total emissions for firms in the scheme remained over 250 million tonnes, but
insisted the reduction in total emissions provided evidence that emissions
trading can work to help "turn the oil tanker around".
The minister also argued that the extension of carbon trading in the UK
through the government's new Carbon Reduction Commitment was part of a wider
trend which should soon result in the formation of a global carbon market – one
which he hoped the City of London will sit at the hub of.
"It was hugely encouraging to see
John
McCain endorse a cap-and-trade plan, which means all three presidential
candidates support the idea," he said, adding that with a new scheme being
prepared in Australia and South Korea also considering such a mechanism the
groundwork was being laid for a genuinely global carbon market.
For many observers the cloud on the horizon remains the difficulty of
engineering a UN-backed international agreement that would see all countries,
including China, India and the US, endorse the binding emission caps required to
make such a global scheme work.
However, Woolas again argued there was cause for optimism over the
negotiations. "The good news is the US election and the fact that the Chinese
government is part of the solution and not part of the problem," he said. "The
Chinese economy might be part of the problem, but the Chinese government gets
this issue – not least because of the damage climate change and pollution is
doing to their country."
He identified an agreement on tackling deforestation as a top priority for
the on-going talks, arguing that the issue was too readily ignored by many
commentators. "Carbon emissions from the deforestation that happens every 24
hours equate to flying 25 million people across the Atlantic," he said. "This
issue dwarfs the debate over aviation [and] we have to get deforestation into
the agreement."
This story first appeared at BusinessGreen's
Corporate Climate Response
blog
Comments
Have your say on this article