An environmental charity opposed to Royal
Mail building a new depot on 45 acres of Essex marshland has vowed to
continue its campaign despite Royal Mail saying it has abandoned plans to move
in.
Yesterday, the
Telegraph
reported victory for the Invertebrate Conservation Trust, aka
Buglife, which promotes the conservation of
insects, arachnids and so on. But today the Trust said it would continue its
campaign because it suspects that Royal Mail has only delayed its decision.
Advertisement
“Our position remains that until such time as Royal Mail issues an
incontrovertible statement that they will never occupy the West Thurrock Marshes
site, then they and their distribution hub remain a real threat to the
endangered wildlife of this extraordinary site,” Jamie Roberts, Buglife projects
manager, told BusinessGreen.com
However, Royal Mail’s press office is unequivocal that there are no secret
plans afoot.
“Royal Mail doesn’t have any plans to move onto the site… hasn’t filed a
planning application for the site… and has been looking at alternative sites for
some months,” a spokesperson told BusinessGreen.com
Buglife fought an unsuccessful High Court action in February to contest the
planning approval of the site and subsequent development. Letters sent to the
High Court last June, seen by BusinessGreen.com, clearly show Royal Mail as the
intended tenant of the site and highlight the “unquantifiable likely costs and
impact on the Mail’s quality of service” should litigation prevent Royal Mail
from moving in to the site later than September 2008.
Royal Mail wanted the Thurrock site as a regional distribution centre, to
replace the centre on Stephenson Road, Canning Town, which the company has to
vacate by December 2008 because it is earmarked for redevelopment under the 2012
Olympics scheme.
Outline planning approval for the West Thurrock site was granted last year by
Thurrock Thames Gateway Development
Corporation (TTGDC) to Rosemound Developments (now part of Goodman Property
Investments).
Buglife’s High Court case, citing the Natural Environment and Rural
Communities Act (2006), claimed the planned depot would cause “catastrophic
damage” to rare, indigenous, invertebrate wildlife. Thurrock Council, which was
ousted from the planning process by TTGDC, said that it would not have approved
the application on environmental grounds if it had still been in charge of the
planning process.
However, the judge, Justice Mitting, accepted Rosemound’s view that the
environmental damage would only occur while the site was being developed, not
once it was in operation as a Royal Mail Depot.
Comments
Have your say on this article