Transport for London dismisses claims £25 congestion charge will lead to
increased emissions and accuses car maker of trying to distract attention from
its high emission vehicles
The row between Porsche and Ken
Livingstone over the London Mayor's
plans
to impose a £25 congestion charge on the most polluting vehicles took a
fresh twist yesterday after the car manufacturer released a report claiming the
move would inadvertently result in an increase in carbon emissions.
The report, which was discovered by Porsche, was undertaken by researchers at
King's College London for
Transport for London (TfL) and claimed that
the increased charge would increase carbon emissions across greater London by
182,000 tonnes. It argued that any savings within central London would be
negated by an increase in the number of car journey emissions outside the
congestion zone.
Advertisement
The findings mirror a similar Land Rover-sponsored study from the
Centre for Economics and Business Research,
which claimed the changes would have a negligible impact on emissions as owners
of the most polluting vehicles would be likely to simply pay the charge or
perhaps even buy a second smaller car that they would then only use in the
congestion zone.
Porsche, which has launched a judicial review against the changes to the
scheme, claimed that King's findings contradicted claims from the mayor and TfL
that the move would deliver significant environmental benefits.
However, TfL rejected Porsche's claims CO2 emissions would rise and accused
the company of attempting to deflect attention from its cars' high emission
levels.
TfL said that the King's College research had focused on emissions of
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Particulate Matter (PM10) and that while it projected
a negligible short-term increase in these emissions the figures were now being
revisited.
Sean Beevers, the academic in charge of the air quality modelling work at
King's Environmental Research Group College, admitted there had been a problem
with the initial research based on "ambiguity in the assumptions" underpinning
the research.
"As a consequence of this process, moving forward we are currently providing
TfL with revised assessments," he said. "These are likely to show that the PM10
and NOx effects are smaller than previously projected and that our estimates of
the CO2 effects are broadly comparable with those that have been produced by
TfL."
Malcolm Murray-Clark, managing director planning at TfL, insisted that the
agency's own analysis of the impact of the new charge on CO2 levels showing that
emissions from cars travelling to and from the zone will fall by 5,000 tonnes
by 2009 remained "accurate and robust".
"We have made clear we will vigorously contest Porsche's claims and any
tactics designed to deflect attention away from the main issue," he added. "
They should focus their attention on cutting CO2 emissions from the cars they
produce, rather than pursuing this pointless legal action."
Comments
Have your say on this article