Sounds important.
It's "the great project of our generation," not to mention "the most
far-reaching legislative proposals made by the European commission for many
years" if you believe EU president José Manuel Barroso.
Ah, good old political hyperbole.
Not this time. If these measures make it onto the statute book they really do
have the potential to change the way we all live and do business. If the various
targets and mechanisms are enforced properly with crippling fines for non
compliance then governments and businesses will have no alternative but to
deliver a low carbon economy.
So what can we expect?
The proposals aim to set in stone the 20:20:20 targets Brussels has been touting
for the past few years. That means a 20 per cent cut in carbon emissions and 20
per cent of the energy mix delivered from renewables by 2020. For good measure
there's also a target for 10 per cent of all road fuels to come from biofuels by
2020.
So we all have to knock a fifth of our carbon footprint?
Well that would be nice. But I'm afraid it's a bit more complicated than that.
To account for the different levels of development of each of the member states
the action plan is governed by the principle of effort sharing which means
different countries and sectors have different targets. So all the heavy
industries in the emissions trading scheme (ETS) will have to deliver a 21 per
cent cut in emissions by 2020 regardless of where they are. Meanwhile, targets
for sectors outside the ETS vary from country to country with developed
economies such as the UK and Denmark having to deliver cuts of 16 and 20 per
cent respectively, while developing economies such as Bulgaria will actually be
allowed to increase emissions by 20 per cent.
Pretty daunting then.
Yup, and it could get more daunting still if the unbelievable happens and an
international agreement to follow on from Kyoto was agreed. If that happens and
the US and China agree to mandatory cuts the Commission has said it will
activate "automatic triggers" (whatever they may be) and commit to 30 per cent
cuts.
How do we meet these targets?
The Commissions proposals are pretty wide ranging covering everything from plans
for more carbon capture plants to increased investment in energy efficiency, but
essentially it boils down to a three pronged approach: reforms to the emissions
trading scheme (ETS), legally binding targets for the proportion of renewable
energy in the overall energy mix, and similar targets for biofuels.
Go on.
Well, the big one is the ETS. Industries such as aviation will be
dragged into the scheme to join heavy polluters such as the energy companies and
the caps on emissions from 2013 will get progressively tighter. Ultimately the
scheme should deliver a 21 per cent cut on 2005 emissions by 2020 and as demand
for credits increases the price of carbon should climb to around €35 a tonne.
But the really big change will be that instead of being given their credits for
free and then being able to trade them the Commission is proposing firms in the
scheme will have to buy the credits they need at auction each year. They will
have to pay for every tonne of carbon they emit, in effect creating a carbon
tax.
The business lobby aren't going to like that. What's to stop them
just moving operations to China?
That's the Commission's big fear. Heavy polluters such as the cement, steel and
aluminium industries have been making noises that they would up and leave if
costs got too high so the Commission has extended them an olive branch by saying
that certain vulnerable to international competition would continue to get free
allocations. However, most industries won’t be so lucky. Energy companies will
have to buy all their credits at auction from 2013 and other sectors will see
auctioning phased in up to 2020.
And the other two parts of the strategy?
The renewables targets are pretty self explanatory - the UK, for example, must
generate 15 per cent of its energy from renewable energy or face massive fines.
Cue, huge increase in renewable energy investment, popping of champagne corks at
wind turbine firms, and frustration at the CBI who claim targets interfere with
the market and that the ETS should ensure that the most cost effective means of
cutting emissions is pursued.
And they've stuck with the biofuels targets?
Looks like it. There had been whispers that the Commission might cave into calls
from environmentalists to abandon the targets, but instead it has simply
introduced plans to ensure that only sustainable biofuels are used. Quite how it
plans to enforce this when a not insignificant proportion of biofuels already
comes from illegal plantations is unclear.
Right, that's all clear then, but what does it all mean?
In a nutshell the combination of increased renewables investment and carbon
credit auctions means higher energy costs. Estimates range from a five per cent
increase in energy prices by 2020 to a price hike of 15 per cent plus,
irrespective of inflation. But the wide-reaching nature of the ETS means costs
in many other sectors will also increase, flights will get more expensive, as
will carbon intensive products such as steel and cement. The paper industry, for
example, has already warned its products will get more expensive. Meanwhile,
governments will have to deliver carbon savings from those sectors outside the
ETS which will mean more stringent regulations and in the case of the UK an
extension of carbon trading to include sectors such as retail and leisure.
That's going to be painful.
Indeed, but there is an upside the cost pressure will make investment in low
carbon technologies and business models more attractive and technology
transtions tend to drive economic growth, not dampen it. Cleantech companies
will become titans of the European economy over the next few years creating
thousands, if not millions of jobs and countering the necessary decline in
carbon intensive industries. Overall, Barroso reckons the cost to the EU economy
will be 0.6 per cent of GDP, or €2 per person per week, which sounds reasonable
if you consider it will result in thousands of new cleantech jobs and deliver
the world's first low carbon sustainable economy.
Comments
Have your say on this article