FSA liquidity rule poses $5bn slug on bank revenue

Financial institutions face an immidiate revenue slug of up to £5bn under far-reaching changes to Britain's liquidity rules proposed by FSA

Written by AccountancyAge.com

Banks and other lenders face an immediate impact of up to a £5bn drop in revenue as a result of having to hold more sterling gilts or OECD government bonds than previously under 'far-reaching and robust changes' to Britain's liquidity regime proposed by the Financial Services Authority (FSA).

However, in a consultation paper released yesterday, the FSA said it expected the loss in revenue to be offset by possibly bigger benefits to the lenders from healthier balance sheets, lower losses and a reduction in funding costs.

Advertisement

Companies who have to adhere to the new liquidity rules also face between £150m and £200m in other costs for training, reporting and information technology, while the FSA itself will carry costs between £11m and £14m linked to the new rules.

Andrew Strange, AIFA director of policy, told the Financial Times that, although he fully understood the need to review the requirements in the current economic climate, the proposed increase could pose serious risks to IFA businesses already having difficulties.

Further reading:

Read the Financial Times story

Tags:

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Print

Comments

White papers

Related jobs

More Accounting jobs

Spotlight

Profile: Rob Sewell, CFO of Pension Corporation

After less than two years in the CFO job at...

Ringing the changes - Nokia's new CFO

Nokia surprised everyone by appointing a virtual unknown to the...

How To guides

The archive of Accountancy Age's How To guides

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Job of the week

More finance jobs

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Your next job

Have your say

Will George Osborne's tax plans turn the country around faster than Labour could?
Yes
No - it will make things worse
I can't see much difference between the two

Advertisement

Search white papers

Search white papers

Advertisement

Advertisement