French experts explain fair value during a crisis

French experts explain fair value during a crisis

The experts suggest that an 'upgraded fair value' would stop pro-cyclical effects and allow trading assets to be measured consistently with their intrinsic values

International accounting experts have backed fair-value, saying they do not
endorse views that the standard be rejected in favour of historical cost values.

The experts – Jean-François Lepetit, a member of France’s national accounting
board; PWC partner Etienne Boris and Didier Marteau, a professor at ESCP-EAP,
the European School of Management – said they strongly opposed the way fair
value is applied during a crises.

‘In these circumstances, market value is no longer fair value, in large part
because of the much reduced volume of transactions. Arbitrageurs – including
banks’ own trading desks and hedge funds – withdraw from the trades that
normally deal with the temporary differences that naturally arise between the
market price of an instrument and its intrinsic value.

‘Market prices are hence squeezed by a “crisis discount” as investors also
avoid all credit assets, regardless of intrinsic quality,’ they wrote in the
FT.

The three suggested an ‘upgraded fair value’ which would stop pro-cyclical
effects of mark-to-market and to allow trading assets to be measured
consistently with their intrinsic values.

‘As soon as the accounting regulator in the country concerned considers the
“crisis discount” abnormally high, banks would be required to discontinue
mark-tom-market measurements of credit assets in their trading books that no
longer represented fair value.

‘They would switch to a fair value measurement based on a “mark-to-model”
approach using initial parameters set by the regulator, chiefly probabilities of
default and recovery rates. These data would be established using fundamental
analysis of assets’ credit quality, eliminating “crisis discount”.’

The three experts say the rule could be applied to impaired assets or
structured instruments, whose underlying assets were impaired, such as
‘subprime’ assets.

‘This approach obviously creates an accounting gain, equal to the difference
between the “upgraded fair value” and the market price. We recommend recording
this gain in the income statement and disclosing details of the adjustment in
the notes. These gains would correct the negative impact of any losses already
recognised. The earlier the regulator acts, the less significant the adjustment
to income,’ they said.

Further reading:

FRC cautions ‘inappropriate’ development of IFRS

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource