Property tycoon fined by ICAEW

Property entrepreneur fined £7,500 by the ICAEW over conflict of interest

Written by Penny Sukhraj and Rachael Singh

A well-known property entrepreneur has been slapped with a £7,500 fine from the ICAEW over a conflict of interest he faced in the planned development of Fulham’s football ground, Craven Cottage.

Nicholas Sutton, currently managing director for Imperial Property, told Accountancy Age he was ‘disappointed’ at the ICAEW’s decision to fine him. It also ordered Sutton to pay costs in the case of £10,707.

Advertisement

‘The decision is not right,’ he said.

When the opportunity arose between June 2002 and November 2002 to purchase Craven Cottage stadium for £50m, Sutton failed to disclose it to Crown Dilmun, the property development company where he was managing director.

According to the ICAEW, Sutton had been asked by a third party whether Crown Dilmun was interested in the partial development of the football ground.

‘He failed to apprise Crown Dilmun of this opportunity and, instead, unknown to them, used the information he had obtained for his own purposes, resulting in an arrangement whereby a company he partly owned stood to benefit from the development of the ground,’ ICAEW papers say.

Sutton had earlier been sued by Crown Dilmun over the conflict of interest.

He lost the case in the High Court for acting in breach of his contractual and fiduciary duties.
The ICAEW said the complaint filed against Sutton had been proved and made no further finding against him.

The institute took into account the previous court finding against Sutton. It also considered the fact that his solicitor failed to alert him to the high risks he was running at the time of entering the deal to purchase the football ground.

‘It is to the defendant’s credit that when it was eventually pointed out to him that his actions were not appropriate, he stood aside and allowed his employer an opportunity to take the deal (which it declined and thus, it appears, has suffered no financial loss)… it is noted that any harm that may have been caused by the defendant’s actions has already been redressed by the High Court,’ the ICAEW said.

Tags:

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Print

Comments

White papers

Related jobs

More Accounting jobs

Spotlight

Cutting Pompey to the bone

Portsmouth administrator andrew andronikou has his work cut out saving...

Tell it like it is

Professional service firms have a responsibility to practice what they...

Profile: Eric Anstee

The former chief executive of the ICAEW has plenty to...

More finance jobs

Search thousands of finance jobs:

Find your next job

Hiring now on AccountancyAgeJobs.com:

Your next job

Related finance jobs

Search thousands of finance jobs:

Find your next job

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Newsletters

Have your say

Following the PBR, who do you think should reside in No. 11?
Alistair Darling
George Osborne
Vince Cable

Advertisement

White papers

How to make better financial decisions - Free FD Handbook

When reviewing your business and accounting software, this free two- part guide explains all you need to know.

The Future of the Financial Close: Automating Account Reconciliations and Review

Many firms have made account reconciliation automation the focus of their drive. This paper describes why.

More white papers

Advertisement

White paper library

Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies; IThound.com brings you over 6,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.