Property tycoon fined by ICAEW

Property entrepreneur fined £7,500 by the ICAEW over conflict of interest

Written by Penny Sukhraj and Rachael Singh

A well-known property entrepreneur has been slapped with a £7,500 fine from the ICAEW over a conflict of interest he faced in the planned development of Fulham’s football ground, Craven Cottage.

Nicholas Sutton, currently managing director for Imperial Property, told Accountancy Age he was ‘disappointed’ at the ICAEW’s decision to fine him. It also ordered Sutton to pay costs in the case of £10,707.

‘The decision is not right,’ he said.

When the opportunity arose between June 2002 and November 2002 to purchase Craven Cottage stadium for £50m, Sutton failed to disclose it to Crown Dilmun, the property development company where he was managing director.

According to the ICAEW, Sutton had been asked by a third party whether Crown Dilmun was interested in the partial development of the football ground.

‘He failed to apprise Crown Dilmun of this opportunity and, instead, unknown to them, used the information he had obtained for his own purposes, resulting in an arrangement whereby a company he partly owned stood to benefit from the development of the ground,’ ICAEW papers say.

Sutton had earlier been sued by Crown Dilmun over the conflict of interest.

He lost the case in the High Court for acting in breach of his contractual and fiduciary duties.
The ICAEW said the complaint filed against Sutton had been proved and made no further finding against him.

The institute took into account the previous court finding against Sutton. It also considered the fact that his solicitor failed to alert him to the high risks he was running at the time of entering the deal to purchase the football ground.

‘It is to the defendant’s credit that when it was eventually pointed out to him that his actions were not appropriate, he stood aside and allowed his employer an opportunity to take the deal (which it declined and thus, it appears, has suffered no financial loss)… it is noted that any harm that may have been caused by the defendant’s actions has already been redressed by the High Court,’ the ICAEW said.

Enjoyed this article? Help spread the word:

Comments

Reader comments for this story

White papers

Related jobs

Spotlight

Accountants and the crisis: the outlook - ready for the worst

The downturn is hurting and forecasts of recession hang heavy...

PwC 10-year anniversary special report

Relive how the controversial mega-merger of Price Waterhouse and Coopers...

Make partner fast with YP

The latest edition of Young Professional features our definitive guide...

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Search white papers

Search white papers

Have your say

Job of the week

More finance jobs...

Your next job