Revenue under fire over IT system planning

Cost of new system has tripled since 2004

Written by AccountancyAge.com

The Public Accounts Committee has slammed HM Revenue & Customs over the cost of its new computer system which has tripled since 2004.

The PAC concluded in its report on the handling of the 'Aspire' computer system contract, that the way HM Revenue & Customs awarded the contract failed to reflect that its IT needs could change a lot over the course of the contract.

In its report, MPs also criticised HM Revenue & Customs for subsidising the bid costs of IT companies vying for the contract to the tune of £52m in order to secure competition.

The computer system, which supports services in areas such as child benefit payments and income taxation is run by consultants Capgemini.

The French firm won the £2.9bn contract in 2004. It increased to £4.5bn in 2005 when the Inland Revenue was merged with Customs & Excise.

After the government admitted last year that the IT system would cost £8.5bn over the 10-year life of the contract, the PAC launched its investigation.

Further reading:

4,000 sign up to offshore tax disclosure scheme

Taxman furious over buy-to-let row

Bates blames Revenue for Leeds collapse

Enjoyed this article? Help spread the word:

Comments

Reader comments for this story

White papers

Related jobs

Spotlight

Richard Solomons, FD of Intercontinental Hotel Group

Profile: Richard Solomons, FD of InterContinental Hotel Group

Richard Solomons is masterminding Intercontinental Hotel Group's strategy of ownership,...

PwC 10-year anniversary special report

Relive how the controversial mega-merger of Price Waterhouse and Coopers...

Make partner fast with YP

The latest edition of Young Professional features our definitive guide...

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Search white papers

Search white papers

Have your say

Fair value accounting has attracted a lot of criticism, but is it actually fair?
Yes, it's better than any other method available.
No, it's caused too much trouble. Get rid.
It's promising but could work better with modifications.

Job of the week

More finance jobs...

Your next job