City millionairess triumphs in tax avoidance challenge

A wealthy City headhunter has won another victory in a battle with HMRC over a complex tax avoidance scheme that reduced her tax bill by half a million pounds

Written by Nicholas Neveling

Philippa D’Arcy, one of the richest and most powerful women in the Square Mile, fought off a second attempt by HMRC to clamp down on a byzantine ‘repo’ scheme.

The taxman was appealing a special commissioners’ decision in favour of D’Arcy but once again suffered defeat when the judge in the case upheld the decision of the commissioners.

D’Arcy, whose maiden name is Rose, founded the Rose Partnership, which has become a premier recruitment firm for the City’s biggest investment banks.

Various rich lists have estimated her personal fortune in the tens of millions of pounds, matching the wealth of celebrity investment fund manager Nicola Horlick.

HMRC has been engaged in an ongoing battle with D’Arcy over her use of the ‘repo’ tax planning scheme involving the purchase and subsequent sale of gilts, claiming an expense on the purchase and tax relief on the gains.

The scheme was implemented by D’Arcy’s tax adviser Philip Shirley and broker NCL Investments in 2002. Recent legislation blocked the use of such schemes.

Tax experts have described the case as one of the most complex and opaque of recent times, a view acknowledged in the High Court judgment.

‘This is, in my view, one of those cases which will inevitably occur from time to time in a tax system as complicated as ours, where a well-advised taxpayer has been able to take advantage of an unintended gap left by the interaction between two different sets of statutory provisions,’ said Justice Henderson.

John Cullinane, president of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, said the D’Arcy case demonstrated how complex legislation could do more harm than good.

‘The lesson to be drawn from this is that it is the complexity of the legislation that gave this taxpayer the opportunity to reduce her tax liability in a way that HMRC clearly did not approve of,’ Cullinane said.

He added that the case showed the ‘folly’ of trying to fight tax avoidance through detailed laws, which increased the compliance burden on the majority of taxpayers and opened the door to further intricate planning HMRC disapproves of.

Enjoyed this article? Help spread the word:

Comments

Reader comments for this story

White papers

Related jobs

Spotlight

Profile: Ian Powell, chairman of PwC

Being number one isn't enough for PwC chairman Ian Powell....

Credit crunch special: guiding business through the storm

The downturn is hurting and recession looms. Will accountants be...

Beat the credit crunch with Young Professional

Latest issue features a guide to advancement during economic uncertainty,...

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Search white papers

Search white papers

Have your say

Would rumoured Treasury moves to abolish stamp duty do anything to help the housing market?
Yes, scrapping stamp duty has been a long time coming
No, any move is far too little, too late

Job of the week

More finance jobs...

Your next job