LibDems accuse Brown of 'fudging' figures

Chancellor Gordon Brown is creating a black hole in his spending plans of£50bn over five years - plus £21bn in contingent liabilities for Network Rail, according to projections from the Liberal Democrat Treasury team.

Written by our parliamentary staff

Shadow chancellor Matthew Taylor warned that without action to boost business investment, 'fudged figures' in Brown's forecasts would threaten his plans for schools and hospitals.

He predicted a £10bn-a-year shortfall - equal to a third of the increase in health spending planned over the period.

Advertisement

Taylor claimed his figures 'show that Gordon Brown fudged the figures in adesperate attempt to avoid having to forecast even higher borrowing figures'.

He added: 'In the last parliament Gordon Brown was inclined to use verycautious assumptions in order to tuck away revenues for a rainy day - but nowthis strategy has changed by 180 degrees!'

He claimed Brown's original growth figures were based on population growth estimates above those of the Government Actuary. They include faster increases in productivity and the assumption that corporation taxes will grow in line with GDP - above long term averages despite cuts - and they disregard a fall in tobacco revenue resulting from easing cross border rules and rising VAT trader fraud.

Tags:

Comments

White papers

Related jobs

More Accounting jobs

Spotlight

Stuart Bridges, Hiscox

Stuart Bridges: FD of Hiscox

Dull is the new black in these straightened times –...

Top 30 Accounting Networks and Associations 2008

The race to become the biggest firm on the planet...

Barack Obama Accountancy Age cover October 2008

Obama: asset or liability?

What an Obama presidency could mean for you

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Job of the week

More finance jobs

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Your next job

Have your say

Will proposed tax cuts help to stimulate the economy?
Yes
No

Advertisement

Search white papers

Search white papers

Advertisement