Fraud review: opportunity missed

Government's response to the fraud review has been disappointing

Written by Rosalind Wright

The proposals of the government Fraud Review, published for consultation in July were ground-breaking, exciting and constructive. They were designed to make major improvements in the way fraud is reported, investigated and prosecuted in this country. They generated much support and enthusiasm from both the public and the private sector.

The government’s response, this month, to its own Fraud Review, however, has been a damp squib. The process of putting the proposals into effect is not being treated with enough urgency, suggesting that Whitehall continues to treat a devastating human problem as a low priority. The hoped-for commitment by the Home Office to put flesh on the bones of the recommendations was absent.

Advertisement

Where one hoped for a positive pledge of new resources for hard-pressed fraud squads and a firm timetable for action, there is only a promise that the Attorney General’s programme board will ‘publish information about the progress of its work’ by the end of 2007.

This, despite figures released by the Association of Chief Police Officers on 7 March, confirming that financial crime is now costing the country at least £13.9bn a year, increasing to £20bn when income tax and EU fraud are added. This amounts to £330 for every man, woman and child in the country.

The great majority of the principal proposals will be cost neutral. These proposals include; setting up a national fraud strategic authority; setting up a national fraud reporting centre; the encouragement of plea bargaining and the setting up of a virtual “financial court” to deal comprehensively with the civil, criminal and disciplinary issues arising out of the same case.

But the proposals that will make the significant difference to the way fraud is tackled, the recommendations to make fraud a policing priority that, “as a minimum”, the existing capacity of fraud squads should be maintained and these resources ring-fenced as far as possible, will cost money. Appropriate capacity and capability to deal with level 1 frauds occurring at a local borough command unit level, will also cost money. The Review estimates that a further £27m will be needed to supplement the existing police resources dedicated to fraud investigation.

Fraud is a growing problem and is fast becoming more sophisticated. Professional law enforcement needs to have the resources available to tackle it. The initiatives which the Fraud Review team have developed are adventurous, imaginative and bold. If only the money can be found to make them work.

Rosalind Wright CB QC is chairman of the Fraud Advisory Panel

Tags:

Comments

White papers

Related jobs

More Accounting jobs

Spotlight

Andrew Higginson, Tesco Personal Finance

Profile: Andrew Higginson, CEO of Tesco Personal Finance

He’s spent more than a decade at the top of...

Top 30 Accounting Networks and Associations 2008

The race to become the biggest firm on the planet...

Barack Obama Accountancy Age cover October 2008

Obama: asset or liability?

What an Obama presidency could mean for you

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Job of the week

More finance jobs

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Your next job

Have your say

Will proposed tax cuts help to stimulate the economy?
Yes
No

Advertisement

Search white papers

Search white papers

Advertisement