Deloitte, its partners and the former FD of engineering group Semple Cochrane have been cleared of disciplinary charges laid against them.

The Joint Disciplinary Tribunal (JDT) dismissed the complaints laid against Deloitte & Touche, auditors David Crawford, John Durie and Marshall Miller, and former FD and chief executive William Evans.

Semple Cochrane was a Scottish public limited company, which had worked on the refit of the Landing Ship Sir Bedivere (which had taken part in the Falklands Campaign).

Accounting issues arose at the group over the 1999 accounts, among others. While the issued numbers had showed an operating profit of £2.9m, a new board of directors, with new auditors, revised the accounts, transforming the profit of £2.943m into a loss of £2.6m.

All complaints laid against the accountants involved, except for one admitted breach of a rule requiring the keeping of adequate auditing records, were dismissed by the JDT on the grounds that they were unproven or there was not enough evidence.

The admitted breach, related to audit work done by Rutherford Manson Dowds, a Deloitte predecessor firm, did not warrant any action, the JDT decided. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland referred the matter to the Joint Disciplinary Scheme.

The JDS’s executive counsel laid complaints against Crawford, for alleged inadequate work over several years; against Deloitte and Touche and Miller, for alleged inadequate work on the 1999 audit of Semple Cochrane; Durie, for alleged inadequate work on the flotation of Semple Cochrane in 1996; and Evans, in respect of his responsibility for Semple Cochrane’s alleged inadequate contract accounting both before and after its flotation in 1996.

Eventually, Semple Cochrane, owing £37m, was sold to Teesland, in 2002. Teesland was recently itself bought by Valad (Hurst) Ltd.

Vince Niblett, head of audit at Deloitte, said: ‘The JDS report provides long overdue confirmation that there were no grounds to the complaints against Deloitte. Deloitte has maintained from day one that this disciplinary action was unmerited and we are pleased to have been fully exonerated.

‘However, it is regrettable that it has taken almost eight years to conclude this inquiry since the matter was referred to the JDS in November 2000. The careers of a number of innocent individuals have been unfairly prejudiced by this inquiry hanging over them for so long.

‘We take our audit responsibilities extremely seriously and the tribunal’s finding is testament to our robust approach.’