Regulatory demands see AIM clients jump ship to Big Four

Do AIM companies feel they have to go to the giant firms for the IFRS expertise they need?

Written by Nicholas Neveling

The diversity of auditors working for AIM companies has always seen London’s junior exchange held up as the model example of how a competitive audit market should function.

The latest auditor rankings for the third quarter of 2007, released by Hemscott, however, seem to have disturbed the idealistic perception of AIM as a broad church.

The market still has a mid-tier firm, Grant Thornton, as its market leader and the giant global firms of Deloitte, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & Young still trail
BDO Stoy Hayward in the client number stakes.

What has attracted attention, though, is the spotting of a trend by KPMG that a number of its client wins on AIM over the third quarter were driven by demand for IFRS expertise, as AIM companies have had to make the transition to the new standards.

‘IFRS on AIM has been a main driver for us. There has been a big impetus for IFRS expertise and we have benefited from having been through the process with our FTSE clients,’ a KPMG spokesman says.

The trend saw KPMG win 18 new AIM clients. If Grant Thornton had not completed its merger with Robson Rhodes it may have been bumped from the top of the pile by KPMG.

Indeed, all the Big Four saw a significant number of client wins over the quarter.

Deloitte won 11 new clients, E&Y won 15 audits and PwC picked up eight new clients.
In contrast BDO Stoy Hayward picked up only two more audits, as did PKF and Smith & Williamson, while Baker Tilly lost nine clients.

So is it the case that AIM companies feel they have to go to the giant firms for the IFRS expertise they need, or did the Big Four simply have a few good months in the market?

David Herbinet, head of public interest markets at Mazars, who increased their AIM client numbers 17 to 40, fears that institutional prejudice may be creeping into the junior market.

‘This could be just another case of institutional prejudice permeating the lower markets, where a company feels that it has to go to certain firms for certain jobs. There is IFRS capability outside the Big Four but companies don’t want to believe it,’ Herbinet says.

Steve Maslin, head of external professional affairs at Grant Thornton, is less concerned about the suggested trends behind the numbers.

‘We are still winning clients organically and from our viewpoint the key issues are our culture which is a good fit with AIM companies. We have also increased our profile in key industry sectors such as media, technology and resources. I can’t think of a single client that we have lost because of IFRS,’ he says.

For more see Hemscott.com

Enjoyed this article? Help spread the word:

Comments

Reader comments for this story

White papers

Related jobs

Spotlight

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Search white papers

Search white papers

Have your say

Has the credit crunch made you fear for your job?
Yes, my company says jobs will go
Maybe, if things get worse, I could be hit
No, business is quite stable

Job of the week

More finance jobs...

Your next job