A blog by Martin Williams, external affairs spokesman of Graydon UK, focusing on business risks - from fraud to late payment. Martin has has spent the last 35 years in the credit information industry, and has been with Graydon UK, one of the top five commercial credit agencies in the UK, for the last 20. Apart from his PR duties, he teaches credit analysis to risk professionals and helps educate SMEs on the importance of maintaining a good credit rating. Martin is a Fellow of the Institute of Credit Management and is a sitting member of the Institute's Think Tank. He was also honoured by Credit Today, after being included on their Credit 100 list of people who have had the greatest impact in the credit industry during 2008, 2009 and 2010.
|
10 Nov 2009
Should I be more interested in Income Tax avoidance schemes or looking after the longer term solvency of my business? Some SME owners are facing up to this issue before next April's hike in the higher rate of income tax to 50% comes into play .
Tax partners at accountancy firms are reporting that many business owners are contemplating paying out bumper dividends to family members prior to the personal income tax rise in April next year as dividends are taxed at much lower rates. But are they only contemplating this action as a result of advice accountants are giving them?
Some tax experts are openly saying that this type of move by business owners is very legitimate and understandable tax planning....... but in the middle of a recession, are some accountants sending out the wrong message to small firms?
I read an alternative view in the Daily Telegraph in early November when Richard Mannion, national tax director of Smith & Williamson, stated that many companies recovering from the recession may well be advised to reduce dividend payments to protect their reserves. Reducing shareholders equity by paying larger than normal dividends out of retained profits will not do wonders for long term solvency- nor, might I add as a credit agency man, will it do much for company credit ratings, at a time when SMEs in particular are finding it difficult to obtain credit and finance.
I guess at the end of the day, all business owners have choices. After all, if you own and run a business, you can pay yourself what you like. You are also free to try and minimise your tax bill. My point is that accountants should at least advise business owners that there are consequences to any business decision, and that decisions should be taken on an informed basis. What i don't want to hear next year is a bunch of small business owners who've paid out big dividends before April 2010 bleating on about their inability to get credit from credit granters. You pays your money.. and takes your choice!
Visitor comments
Been with Natwest 16 months, from the outset I was refused free business banking due to a technical glitch on my credit report. I should add this was not my fault and I had letters backing this. Last month we faced some difficulties when a customer did not pay an invoice, I informed Natwest immediately that a few DD payments would likely fail. They agreed to refund me charges should this happen. To my horror they found it reasonable to charge me ?485 in failed payments!
Posted by: Reginald Ostasiewicz , 24 Feb 2010
Frances Coppola on Sort out the credit sloths
TaxTeddy on EU ding dong over accounts filing Exemption
martin williams on Insolvency stats are head-scratchingly strange
Robert MMoore on Insolvency stats are head-scratchingly strange
slightly optimistic on PIGS Keep Europe in an Economic Trough
Adding your comment