THE NEWS that Hewlett Packard has been forced to write down its $10.3bn investment in Autonomy by 85% only 15 months after completing the deal will come as no great surprise to critics of the testosterone-fuelled M&A transactions so common in the past few years.
Even before today's bombshell, our H-Score® rating of Hewlett Packard was only a marginal 34 out of a maximum of 100, and heading sharply south.
This latest debacle comes just after research showed that the Stoxx Euro 600 Index companies wrote off the staggering sum of €76bn goodwill in 2011, a figure big enough to fund half a Greek bail-out and more.
When will international financial reporting standards be tightened up to force over-ambitious executives to write off acquisition goodwill over a fixed period of no more than, say, three years, rather than leaving valuations to their own discretion and academic verification by their auditors?
If these sorts of mandatory write-down also affected their bonus packages, maybe there would be fewer of these crazy mega-deals and, more importantly, fewer shocks for shareholders, whether or not they are caused by alleged financial irregularities.
Nick Hood is head of external affairs at Company Watch
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.