aop
ad

In defense of NEDs

by Richard Mead

01 Jul 2002

The government has recently commissioned Derek Higgs to produce a report on the subject. It is perhaps no coincidence that Higgs is himself a distinguished corporate financier, with a long career at Warburgs, for NEDs are very often in the thick of their companies' corporate finance deals.

It is sometimes forgotten that NEDs have identical responsibilities to their executive colleagues and this is keenly felt whenever a company undertakes a significant transaction, whether financing or M&A. The NEDs' overall role is to question and probe the rationale and to ensure that shareholders as a whole are deriving maximum value and that their interests are fully protected.

NEDs really come into their own whenever conflicts of interest occur.

In such a situation, the requirement is not so much for non-executive as for independent directors, as some NEDs represent significant stakeholders and cannot be considered independent.

By way of example, I was an independent NED in a quoted company whose shares were more than 50% held by a single shareholder. The latter decided to sell its shares, thereby provoking an automatic full bid under the take-over code. The executives were intensely hostile to the company being sold over their heads. I and another independent NED sat in the middle and found that we had to play a key role.

On the one hand we had to persuade the executive directors that the controlling shareholder was entirely within its rights to sell and that the best thing they could do would be to co-operate and thereby obtain for themselves some measure of control over the process. On the other hand we had to persuade the shareholder that it needed the support of management to obtain the best possible price. The outcome, not achieved without some difficulty, was a limited auction in which both parties worked together to produce an excellent result for the shareholders.

In his parting address as retiring president of the Institute of Directors, Lord Young questioned the need for NEDs. In major transactions, they are often key to protecting and optimising the interests of the shareholders.

  • Richard Mead is an independent consultant and a member of the executive committee of the ICAEW Corporate Finance Faculty.

Visitor comments Add your comment

display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities