11 Jun 2009
As if FDs don’t have enough to deal with, the Budget threw up an unwelcome surprise for many in the guise of clause 92 of finance bill 2009: the duties of senior accounting officers of large companies.
In short, the senior accounting officer, the FD in most instances, is to be made personally responsible for ensuring that the accounting arrangements are adequate for the purposes of accurate tax calculations.
Failure to do so could not only result in financial penalties for the company, but also for individuals.
The personal responsibility aspect of these measures is unexpected and will no doubt be of concern to those identified as SAOs, although the threat of a financial penalty appears to be the least of their concerns.
According to a recent poll by Deloitte of more than 100 senior finance and tax figures from leading UK businesses, only 3% believe they would have to pay the penalty out of their own pocket. In most instances, it seems likely that the company would pick up the bill for any penalty levied at its SAO. What is far more telling is that half of those surveyed believe that being penalised would have a negative impact on their career and reputation. In other words, FDs really could be putting their reputations on the line.
While I should make clear that the legislation will broadly affect companies with a turnover of £200m upwards, that still means a major headache, additional workload and further cost burden for thousands of FDs. The ‘self reporting’ of inadequacies places yet another responsibility on the company’s governance processes and it is likely there will be significant additional internal procedures and documentation required in order to report the SAO’s certification.
Half of those surveyed are concerned that their companies may not be immediately compliant with this new measure, and nearly nine out of 10 believe achieving compliance will cost their organisations in excess of £50,000.
The only silver lining is that reviewing the accounting process may identify tax savings, because they will be better able to identify and then support tax deductions.
But the bottom line is that this legislation will require considerable focus from a large number of FDs over the coming months, at a time when their full attention is needed to steer their companies’ through these choppy economic waters.
Margaret Ewing is is a partner and vice-chairman at Deloitte
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
Scaremongering
I hope that sensible accountants will be able to think for themselves and ignore the scaremongering promoted by the big accountancy and legal firms.
UK Finance Directors / Senior Accounting Officers should remember when the americans asked for advisers to help them implement SOX - it cost a fortune and missed the point. If companies have been happy saying that they have reviewed the effectiveness of internal controls they should be able to be happy with their tax processes.
It seems that the reported minimum £50k cost is what the big firms have decided it will cost to review their current tax advice and external audit methodologies.
Who will come out and say that all most companies need to do is review the processes they already have and make sure they are robust and evidenced?
Posted by: SK, 12 Jun 2009 | 00:00
MPs and accountants in collusion?
The conspiracy theorists (or is that cynics) would say that the legislators come up with these wheezes just to keep the accountants in business. The accounting profession however should be honest with its clients as to the real nature of the issue and not seek to take advantage. As an FD I want an honest apppraisal of what I need to do - not an embellishment just because you can. Lets bring the integrity back and just maybe the world will be a better place as a consequence.
Posted by: matilda, 17 Jun 2009 | 00:00