aop
ad

Pre-packs: trade secrets

by Mike Jervis

29 Jan 2009

A number of recent, high profile cases have cast a critical light on a process used by most insolvency firms ­ the ‘pre-pack’. In short, this is where a deal to sell the assets of a failing company is agreed prior to insolvency and completed immediately after the appointment of administrators or receivers.

Many of the negative perceptions of the pre-pack process stem from the fact that it can appear as if a business is failing and the next day, it is being run as a new company with no liabilities, sometimes by the same individuals. Creditors and shareholders assume the insolvency practitioner (IP) and the directors have pushed through a quick deal which means they win and creditors lose out.

An obvious point for the IP to make is that a pre-packaged sale of a business does not absolve him from his duty to obtain the best price for the business in question. A pre-pack does not miraculously sanitise a sale at less than full value to insiders or existing management. A pre-pack is an insolvency process and as such, a practitioner has to account for his actions to all creditors.

The introduction of a Statement of Insolvency Practice (SIP 16, on pre-packaged sales by administrators) by the regulatory authorities has been timely. The key to the SIP is the obligation to provide creditors with a detailed explanation and justification of why the sale was undertaken so that creditors can be satisfied the administrator has acted with due regard to their interests. This includes a special mention of circumstances where connected parties purchase the business out of the pre-pack process.

It also encourages the IP to inform the creditors and hold the first meeting of creditors as soon as possible after appointment. This is the time when there is likely to be a number of open questions from creditors about what happened.

A pre-pack is neither good nor bad in itself ­ what makes the difference is what goes on behind the scenes to ensure the transaction pays off for all stakeholders as far as possible. Most IPs will try to make sure they are signing the right deal before anyone outside the process is aware of the sale.

The challenge for IPs is to get better at explaining the circumstances when a pre-pack is the best means of preserving value for creditors and shareholders and their role in the process. Although this has been best practice for most IPs, the new SIP has clearly codified this.

Mike Jervis is a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Visitor comments Add your comment

display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities