HMRC's tax evasion proposals ‘presume guilt’ warn advisers

by Calum Fuller

More from this author

20 Aug 2014

  • Comments
HM Revenue and Customs

ADVISERS have wasted little time in raising concerns over proposals to introduce a new criminal offence and civil sanctions in offshore tax evasion cases.

In two consultation documents, HM Revenue & Customs is seeking views on the design of the new criminal offence, appropriate safeguards and also tougher civil sanctions for offshore evaders including those who move their taxable assets between offshore banks in different countries in an attempt to hide their wealth.

Enhanced penalties of up to 200% of the tax for offshore income tax and capital gains tax liabilities have applied since April 2011.

The consultation examines situations in which individuals move assets from one offshore centre that has tightened its tax-information-sharing laws to another that has more lax rules.

The 20-year rule limiting how far back HMRC can examine taxpayer's affairs could also be suspended.

But advisers are worried the move is "draconian" and brings in a "statutory presumption of guilt", according to Phil Berwick, head of contentious tax at law firm Irwin Mitchell.

In the past, in order to successfully prosecute a person for tax evasion, HMRC had to demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that they intended to evade tax. That onus could now be removed.

HMRC is "seeking to re-write the rules on offshore penalties before there has been an opportunity to establish the effectiveness of the current regime, which was only introduced in April 2011," he said.

For some, that threat is unsettling in of itself, but BDO tax partner Dawn Register warned that the policy's interaction with other powers such as ‘naming and shaming' could be potent.

Saffery Champness tax partner Ronnie Ludwig was sceptical of the effect the move will have on tax yield, pointing to the disappointment of the Swiss tax agreement.

"Whether these new measures will actually be effective in getting evaders to pay up is anyone's guess," he said. "The results to date of HMRC's wider efforts to tackle evasion using existing measures have fallen far short of expectations.

"The potential of handcuffs really represents more of a new scare tactic than anything else, as truly hardened evaders the world over are likely to continue to ignore or avoid the UK taxman."

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send



Conservatoire for Dance and Drama, London, Permanent, Part Time, £60,000 pro rata




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.