HMRC to publish list of 1,200 schemes earmarked for pay-up first

by Calum Fuller

More from this author

15 Jul 2014

  • Comments
hmrc-people

INVESTMENT SCHEMES suspected of tax avoidance are today to be named in a 1,200-strong list earmarked for accelerated payment by HM Revenue & Customs, the department has confirmed.

Last week, Accountancy Age learned HMRC expects to raise £7bn through accelerated payment of disputed taxes from 43,000 taxpayers over the next two years.

Of that figure, 33,000 are individual taxpayers expected to contribute £5.1bn. The individuals affected have a mean gross income of £262,000, HMRC said. The other 10,000 are businesses, bringing the predicted figure up to £7bn.

Under the new ‘Accelerated Payment' rules, HMRC will be able to make taxpayers pay disputed tax in advance, rather than waiting for the outcome of a tax tribunal ruling. If the taxpayer wins their case, the money is reimbursed with interest.

Royal Assent is required for HMRC to begin utilising the powers, but that is expected within the coming days, along with the rest of the Finance Act.

Hundreds of investors including business leaders, sports stars and entertainers were warned last week to prepare to receive sizeable tax bills as HMRC cracks down on the use of alleged tax avoidance schemes.

Ingenious Media, an investment company, issued a warning to 1,300 investors, including sports stars such as David Beckham, that they could be forced to pay back all the tax they saved, possibly with interest, by using its alleged tax avoidance scheme, the Financial Times reported.

The company has financed box-office hits such as Avatar and has previously denied that its film and game partnerships are tax avoidance schemes, saying they are legitimate businesses that have generated more than £1bn of taxable revenue.

Last week, several celebrities along with senior executives and QCs were implicated in a £1.2bn scheme known as Liberty, which saw huge artificial losses generated offshore which members could then use to avoid tax on other income.

Class action services firm Rebus has launched a service specifically aimed at recouping losses for investors who were alegedly mis-sold the Icebreaker tax avoidance scheme which ring-fenced more than £300m on the premise of saving £135m in tax.

Rebus Icebreaker Settlement Entity (RISE) was launched, Rebus claims, "in response to the lack of communications from Icebreaker", and will act as a "collective voice" for investors, "all of whom have been left with little to no representation". It will assist investors in agreeing any outstanding tax liabilities, arrange a time period for settlement and take appropriate action against those who may have mis-sold the investment originally.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Send

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

budget-management

Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.

cchcover

iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.