THE ICAEW has warned that HMRC is in danger of violating insolvency laws with its new bank raiding powers.
The March Budget saw HMRC given powers to take money from bank accounts of debtors who owe more than £1,000 in tax or tax credits. In the Budget papers it said that the change would bring the UK in line with many other tax authorities such as France and the US.
However, the ICAEW’s tax faculty is warning that HMRC will effectively supersede insolvency law and make itself a preferential creditor under the new rules, as reported by Accountancy Age in March. This could lead to perverse effects such as people keeping money in cash rather than bank accounts and moving funds offshore, the institute warns.
“We believe it is imperative that there are proper safeguards and there should be proper judicial oversight of any decisions made with rights of appeal,” said ICAEW Tax Faculty head Frank Haskew.
He told Accountancy Age that at the moment the details on how the bank raiding powers will take effect are not clear but a consultation before the Finance Bill in 2015, implementing the change, should take place later this year.
HMRC could find itself taking money from a debtor who then enters bankruptcy proceedings. In this scenario an insolvency practitioner appointed to the bankruptcy will have no choice but to pursue HMRC for funds legally belonging to all the creditors.
Haskew added that in this scenario the new rules would be “counter-productive” but that he hoped the consultation and actual rules would tackle this issue.
“Although it is possible [in this scenario] I’d be surprised if it wasn’t looked at. I would have thought some of these problems would be flushed out,” he said.
BHS auditor PwC questioned over why it described the embattled retailer as a 'going concern' days before it was sold for £1
KPMG raised concerns over Retail Acquisition's ability to continue to trade and fund both BHS
Duff & Phelps’ Irish business now boasts over 70 staff
Mexican takeaway chain Chilango has lost its £700,000-plus VAT refund battle with HMRC after the taxman secured victory in a first-tier tribunal