Tax debt disqualifications dominate Insolvency Service stats

by Kevin Reed

More from this author

25 Feb 2014

  • Comments

IS THE Insolvency Service eschewing criminal investigations of directors, instead leaving the taxman to mop up those who have racked up large debts? That is the claim of Michael O'Maoileoin, an insolvency expert at law firm Hugh James.

Analysis of the latest Insolvency Service enforcement record data from the Insolvency service shows the percentage of director disqualifications due to tax debts has jumped in recent years. The percentage was 62% in 2012/13, 52% in 2011/12 and 35% in 2010/11.

But the disqualifications for criminal matters was just 54 in 2012/13, from 259 in 2010/11.

Michael O'Maoileoin, from Hugh James, said: "Proving that an insolvent company has run up a large debt to HMRC is pretty straightforward, but proving more significant wrongdoing may take months of painstaking work by forensic accountants."

"Since its budget was cut, the Insolvency Service simply can't afford to do as much of that kind of work as it used to. It is still bringing in the same amount of low-hanging fruit from tax debts, however.

"It's also a matter of serious concern for the wider business community, because it makes it more difficult for businesses to be sure of the real track record of any director that they are doing business with or even employing."

An Insolvency Service spokeswoman said that all allegations of misconduct and negligence by directors were taken seriously, with investigations "a priority".

"In the last ten months to January 2014, we disqualified over 1,053 directors," said the spokeswoman.

"We have a well-defined and rigorous process to determine which cases should be investigated. Not all investigations will lead to a disqualification, we have to find evidence that we can put before a court to support the making of a disqualification order. Over 10% of disqualifications are for 11-15 years, on average the disqualification period is around 6 years."

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send

Charterhouse Accountants

Finance Officer

Charterhouse Accountants, Beaconsfield, Permanent, Full Time, £ Competitive




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.