Autonomy overstated profits by 80%, HP claims

by Richard Crump

More from this author

04 Feb 2014

  • Comments

THE LONG-RUNNING dispute between Hewlett-Packard and Autonomy, the UK software company it bought for $11.1bn (£6.7bn), escalated yesterday when HP slashed Autonomy's previously published profit and revenue figures.

In restated accounts published on Companies House, HP has drastically revised the 2010 performance of Autonomy Systems Ltd, the UK group's main operating subsidiary, and claimed to have uncovered "extensive errors (including misstatements)" in the previously issued financial statements.

The claims are the latest volley in an increasingly bitter war of words between the technology giant and the former management team of Autonomy following HP's botched 2011 acquisition of Autonomy. A year after the deal was signed, HP wrote down the value of its purchase by $8.8bn, of which $5bn was attributed to accounting misstatements.

In the original accounts, audited by Deloitte, Autonomy Systems reported profit of £105.7m and sales of £175.6m. In the restated version, turnover was revised down to £81.3m and profit was slashed to £19.6m.

According to the accounts, many of the errors relate to recognition of revenue and costs, as well as to the accounting for investments, and to correct the balance sheet for balances denominated in foreign currencies not re-valued at the year end.

"These restatements, and the reasons for them, are consistent with HP's previous disclosures regarding accounting improprieties in Autonomy's pre-acquisition financials," HP said in a statement. "The substantial work necessary to prepare these accounts has revealed extensive accounting errors and misrepresentations in the previously issued 2010 audited financial statement, including the exact problems identified by HP."

However EY, HP's auditors, said it was unable to express an opinion on the restated accounts. In the auditors' report that accompanies the filing, EY said: "We have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion." EY was paid £1.1m for its work, the accounts state.

Mike Lynch, Autonomy's founder and former CEO, has argued that the difference between Autonomy's and HP's valuation of the company stem from different accounting policies applied under US GAAP and IFRS, a claim HP has rubbished as "patently ridiculous'.

In response to the restated accounts, a spokesperson for the former senior management of Autonomy, said they continue to reject HP's allegations.

"Given the size of HP's write-down, we are very surprised by the small size of the adjustments in Autonomy Systems Limited that are attributed to the ongoing accounting dispute, which represent a few percent of group revenue. We know even these include revenue that will be recognised at a later time, under HP's new approach," the spokesperson said.

He also suggested that other causes of the change include a change in accounting policy and transfer pricing between jurisdictions, a mechanism which often reduces a company's UK tax bill. The adjustments have seen HP make a £38.5m claim to HMRC for overpaid tax, a claim not currently agreed by the taxman.

"We hope the UK government will take a robust position in rebuffing HP's attempts to deprive it of over £38m in tax revenue," the spokesperson added.

Deloitte categorically denies that it had any knowledge of any accounting improprieties or misrepresentations in Autonomy's financial statements.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send

Charterhouse Accountants

Finance Officer

Charterhouse Accountants, Beaconsfield, Permanent, Full Time, £ Competitive




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.