LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE is "essential" to accountancy practitioners if they are not to find their trade restricted in comparison to lawyers.
Of the 60 readers to cast votes, 71% described the privilege – which currently sees any professional discussions between lawyers and their clients kept confidential – as essential and branded the current state of affairs as "unsustainable".
Just 13% felt that the privilege should be introduced in a limited form, while marginally more – 16% – felt that the profession has existed perfectly well without it.
The privilege sees any professional discussions between lawyers and their clients kept confidential.
Lawyers are currently the only professionals covered by the privilege, which allows a client to refuse to disclose certain confidential, legal communications to third parties, including courts.
The Supreme Court last month ruled that any extension of the privilege was for parliament to decide. The case was the result of a tax dispute between Prudential and HMRC.
In 2010, the Court of Appeal rejected claims by Prudential that when advising on tax law, accountants should be protected by legal professional privilege.
Take part in the latest Accountancy Age poll:
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.