LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE is “essential” to accountancy practitioners if they are not to find their trade restricted in comparison to lawyers.
Of the 60 readers to cast votes, 71% described the privilege – which currently sees any professional discussions between lawyers and their clients kept confidential – as essential and branded the current state of affairs as “unsustainable”.
Just 13% felt that the privilege should be introduced in a limited form, while marginally more – 16% – felt that the profession has existed perfectly well without it.
The privilege sees any professional discussions between lawyers and their clients kept confidential.
Lawyers are currently the only professionals covered by the privilege, which allows a client to refuse to disclose certain confidential, legal communications to third parties, including courts.
The Supreme Court last month ruled that any extension of the privilege was for parliament to decide. The case was the result of a tax dispute between Prudential and HMRC.
In 2010, the Court of Appeal rejected claims by Prudential that when advising on tax law, accountants should be protected by legal professional privilege.
Take part in the latest Accountancy Age poll:
The England and Wales Cricket board has hit HMRC for six in its VAT battle with the government department
HMRC's customer service has been slammed by the NAO, with critics adding that taxpayers have been "short changed" by the government department
IPA issues first personal insolvency licence after licensing regime opended to greater competition
The search engine's tax affairs have come under further scrutiny following a dawn raid on its Paris offices