28 Jan 2013
AUDITORS, REGULATORS and preparers of financial statements have been criticised for seeing annual reports as a compliance exercise rather than a means of communication.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) made the findings following a survey of prepares and users or financial statements from Africa, Asia, Europe and North America.
Further reading
The survey found that more needs to be done to change the way the profession sees financial disclosure in annual reports and a joint effort is needed to tackle those problems.
Other findings show that nearly all preparers thought the requirements are too extensive and lead to disclosure overload. However, the conveying of relevant information needs to be better communicated, rather than leaving users to sift through large amounts of data.
The ICAEW's head of financial services faculty Dr Nigel Sleigh-Johnson said: "Finding the balance between too much financial disclosure and too little will be highly challenging, as users of financial reports have different needs.
"So-called disclosure overload will not be resolved unless it is tackled together by all the bodies that impose disclosure requirements. That way it may be possible to reduce duplication and unnecessary complexity.
"A good starting point would be to reach a better understanding of the objective of annual reports and on who they are intended for. It is unrealistic to expect the needs of all users to be met in full by a single set of disclosures. Key information should be easily accessible to less sophisticated users, while users who want much more extensive information should have access to what they need. This may require radical restructuring of disclosures and how they are presented."
The survey, which had 225 responses, found more could be done to enhance accounting standards currently set out and improvements could be made to the entire annual report, not just the financial statements.
IASB chairman Hans Hoogervorst (pictured) said: "That feedback indicated a need for standard-setters, auditors, preparers, regulators and investors to work together in order to deliver much-needed improvements to all disclosures, not just those contained within the financial statements.
"Our discussion forum on disclosures next week is the first step on that journey."
The IASB is coordinating a discussion forum on 'Disclosures in Financial Reporting' in London on 28 January which open to the public to attend. A live webcast and a recording will be posted on the IASB's site the next day.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.
Visitor comments Add your comment
What a surprise!
Well you could have knocked me over with a feather!
As disclosure requirements become more complex, of course the focus will shift to compliance - there simply won't be time, energy or money to do anything more than try to get it right. Who ever wrote their finest essay in an exam for goodness sake?
if you want the report to be about communicating clear and useful informationm then you have to allow more latitude on what is presented and how; and reduce the amount of "stuff" that has to be put in just because on a Thursday afternoon 5 years ago an obscure analyst thought it might be useful.
Posted by: Duncan, 29 Jan 2013 | 09:52