THE VARYING USE of the term “tax avoidance” has caused confusion around the ongoing public debate.
In three reports prepared by the Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation at Saïd Business School, on behalf of the National Audit Office (NAO), the centre finds distinguishing characteristics different types of tax avoidance.
It also looked at the effectiveness of HMRC’s tax avoidance disclosure regime (DOTAS), and how it all inter-relates to how HMRC defines the “tax gap” (the difference between tax collected and the tax that should be collected).
The reports are part of evidence gathering for the Public Accounts Committee’s investigation into tackling marketed avoidance schemes.
The three categories of avoidance, all of which are legal, are:
- Ineffective avoidance: Scheme combatted under current legislation that can be dealt with if discovered;
- Effective avoidance: A reduced tax bill from a “defect” in legislation or “failure in the way it is written that cannot be corrected by the courts”. This would probably require better law drafting, specific anti-avoidance rules or even the general anti-avoidance/abuse provision; and
- Taking advantage of legislation and the tax system: Using transactions that reduce tax due to opportunities offered through legislation, or relying on the structure of the international tax system. This can only be dealt with through “radical reform” of the system.
On DOTAS, the centre found that, while the regime has some “limited evidence” of success, it also has its flaws.
The tax gap broadly relates to the previously described “effective avoidance”, which are compliant with the law but against the will of parliament as far as HMRC is concerned. “It is deeply misleading to suggest that this represents non?compliance or a failure to pay tax which is due,” said the centre.
CIot urges HMRC to consider a delay to the 1 September 2017 introduction of its new corporate offence of failure to prevent the criminal facilitation of tax evasion
HMRC intends to extend the date for withdrawal of transitional relief on investment growth from 30 November 2016 to 31 March 2017
The current business rates system is over-complex and reform is needed, but reforms should focus first of all on simplifying the appeals process, particularly for businesses which are subject to business rates exemption
The CIoT has called on the government to rethink its approach to ensuring online sellers pay the correct amount of VAT.