New standards leave UK business with plenty to ponder

by Kevin Reed

More from this author

23 Nov 2012

  • Comments
Roger Marshall

"LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP" is the message from advisors to the introduction of new accounting rules that will eventually replace UK standards.

The first two parts of a new framework to replace our local accounting rules, UK GAAP, have been released by the Financial Reporting Council's standard-setting arm.

FRS 100 and FRS 101, which become mandatory from 1 January 2015, set out the framework for reporting standards and allows reduced disclosures for subsidiaries looking to use international accounting standards (IFRS). New UK GAAP (FRS 102) is expected in the new year.

Advisors have urged clients to take their time – but think early about planning – to decide how the new rules could apply to them.

"There may be cost savings for companies that choose to adopt IFRS or new UK GAAP and there may be advantages for those electing to adopt the reduced disclosure framework," said PwC partner Iain Selfridge.

"Companies will have to assess their group structure and consider the appropriate reporting options for each subsidiary, balancing the needs of financial statements users against the potential cost savings from preparing reduced disclosures.

"Cash tax position, distributable reserves and XBRL (online accounts) tagging requirements may all be affected. Companies that fail to adequately prepare could find moving to a new accounting framework is more costly and time-consuming than they anticipated. The effort involved shouldn't be underestimated."

The move to update the standards effectively brings UK rules into line with international standards – but proportionate to the size and complexity of the company.

Roger Marshall (pictured), FRC board member and chair of the Accounting Council, said: "Respondents asked us for a reduced disclosure framework, principally so that subsidiaries within groups reporting in accordance with EU-adopted IFRS could use the same reporting principles as the group, but with reduced disclosures, given the often limited use for those financial statements. This will result in cost savings for those groups."

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send

Charterhouse Accountants

Finance Officer

Charterhouse Accountants, Beaconsfield, Permanent, Full Time, £ Competitive




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.