THE BBC is "inconsistent" in its policy for contracting , a review by Deloitte and its internal auditors have found.
The review looked at the structures used by individuals hired by the BBC, and its approach to differentiating between those that are freelance and those employed by the broadcaster. The use of contractors within the BBC has proved controversial, with some saying that they are in fact disguised employees and the structures they work within help avoid employment taxes.
It found that there were often occasions where on-air talent engaged as staff, through personal service companies or freelance, were often doing very similar work.
A new test will be launched to gauge whether those hired should in fact be employed, and the BBC will work with the taxman to develop tax treatment for on-air and radio presenters where none currently exists.
The new test, which will be operated by Deloitte, will apply to 804 on-air freelancers.
"This could result in an estimated 131 individuals being offered staff employment when their current contract expires," the BBC said in a statement.
The changes are intended to come into effect from the April 2013 financial year.
The review found that the BBC has a "high standard of tax compliance" and there is no evidence that the BBC uses personal service companies to aid income tax or national insurance contributions avoidance.
It is "critical" for the BBC to retain a freelance model, the review found, to "enable creative renewal" and deliver value for money, the review added.
Zarin Patel (pictured), CFO of BBC, said: "Our review shows the BBC is not using personal service companies to avoid tax or help others avoid tax. Nevertheless, it shows inconsistencies in the way our policy has been applied. We are addressing this with a more objective employment test for all new contracts and by developing a new framework with HMRC for self-employed on-air presenters."
So if the BBC doesn't use personal service companies to aid tax and NIC avoidance, what do they imagine they are being used for?
Posted by: JohnB, 08 Nov 2012 | 14:10
The BBC doesn't do 'inconsistent'.
Their book of e-mail protocol runs to many pages.
HR is a big operation there - if this is passed off as a glitch then it's not just the entertainment parts that do cover-up.
Posted by: EllieMae'sGrandad , 09 Nov 2012 | 14:15
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.