REPRESENTATIVES OF GOOGLE AND STARBUCKS are to give evidence before the Public Accounts Committee as the government probes the US multinationals' UK tax affairs.
Sitting on Monday, the session on HM Revenue & Customs' 2011/12 accounts will also discuss the companies' contributions to the public purse, reports the Financial Times.
Earlier in October, it was reported that Starbucks had filed losses with Companies House since 2009 – meaning it paid no corporation tax – despite having told its shareholders it had a profitable operation in the UK. It is alleged to have paid just £8.6m in corporation tax since it arrived in the UK in 1998.
Google recently attracted criticism as well, reducing its bill by diverting sales through its European headquarters in Ireland. It pays a royalty for the use of its parent company's search and advertising technologies, which causes earnings to move to Bermuda through the Netherlands, according to a 2010 Bloomberg investigation.
Chairwoman of the committee and Labour MP for Barking Margaret Hodge said the committee hearing was "an opportunity to explain why they don't pay proper levels of tax in the UK".
Last week, she queried the prime minister's decision to criticise comedian Jimmy Carr for his involvement in a tax avoidance scheme which saved him £3.3m against the background of large companies avoiding much greater sums.
"Apple, Google, Facebook, eBay and Starbucks have avoided nearly £900m. Will the prime minister now take this opportunity to condemn their behaviour as morally wrong?" she asked.
Cameron said he was "not happy with the current situation" and told the commons large companies mitigating their liabilities can expect to be investigated by the taxman.
Google said in a statement: "We make a substantial contribution to the UK economy through local, payroll and corporate taxes. We also employ over 2,000 people, help hundreds of thousands of businesses to grow online, and invest millions in supporting new tech businesses in east London. We comply with all tax rules in the UK."
Starbucks, too, denies any wrongdoing. "We seek to be good taxpayers and to pay our fair share of taxes ... we don't write this tax code; we are obligated to comply with it, and we do," said a spokeswoman.
Why should it be left to Ms Hodge et al to do HM Revenue & Customs work?
Why didnt Diners Ckud Dave investigate the apparent lack of tax being paid to the Exchequer.
How many more large muti National organisation do not pay their fair share...after all are we not all supposed to be in this (austerity program) together...
Stop fiddling with plumbers and piano tutors and get to grips with organisations that hide behind their expensive lawyers??
Posted by: Red Five, 05 Nov 2012 | 19:56
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.