OECD sets 'test' to stamp out international tax avoidance

by Calum Fuller

More from this author

24 Oct 2012

  • Comments
oecd-headquarters

RULES designed to prevent international tax avoidance have been updated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

An OECD party on fiscal affairs has been working to clarify beneficial ownership of dividends, interest and royalties since 2008, and has devised a test in order to establish beneficiaries.

The test aims to prevent parties from sidestepping withholding taxes as a result of double-tax treaties in force between their countries.

Often, those attempting to avoid any withholding tax use what is known as a 'conduit arrangement' or 'treaty shopping', where the payment is made through an intermediary entity in a jurisdiction with more favourable tax conditions.

Instead, the test defines the beneficial owner as an entity which has "the right to use and enjoy" the payments and "pay it on".

In recent years, there has been uncertainty over whether the recipient who the benefits from these payments should receive a reduced withholding tax rate, which would be otherwise available under a tax treaty between the countries of the payer and recipient.

How far tax authorities can use the beneficial ownership test as an anti-avoidance tool to target the routing of payments through particular countries has also not been clear.

However, PwC tax partner Richard Collier-Keywood is not convinced the revisions achieve any clarification.

He said: "The OECD has provided some clarification on how payments being passed on affect beneficial ownership of income received, but not enough. For instance the new wording refers to 'unrelated payments' without any explanation of what it means for a payment to be related or unrelated.

"Beneficial ownership is a big issue for many international businesses which must comply with complex international and domestic tax rules. Given the current focus on corporate tax affairs, it is more important than ever that the rules affecting the level of tax paid are clear."

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Send

Appointments to University Committees

University of Glasgow 120x60University of Glasgow - Glasgow - unremunerated positions

 

 

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

budget-management

Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.

cchcover

iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.